From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key bindings proposal Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 03:41:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19537.40472.267000.563053@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <176EDAD3B9E54E39870FA3F84A5DDF3C@us.oracle.com> <19542.56658.583000.394397@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19544.1015.468000.280770@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19546.30901.687000.971249@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19546.47167.15000.439215@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <4C5B5C39.9090104@gnu.org> <4C5B66DD.2060901@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281058927 7173 80.91.229.12 (6 Aug 2010 01:42:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 01:42:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 06 03:42:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhBwj-0007kI-JO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:42:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49545 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OhBwi-0006Hp-P2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:42:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55291 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OhBwd-0006Hc-TZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:42:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhBwc-0006n6-Nl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:41:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:50350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OhBwc-0006my-LY; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:41:58 -0400 Original-Received: by qwk4 with SMTP id 4so5241546qwk.0 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:41:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5dR6MJRbkCKpYVVmDA/utYAMQc3DQIsQyHxn/s61Tr8=; b=OPLkHEo2WPkhVP6SHvQCZItfq5ua/0A2uIMD9kePjqljeiK9hp0iqeJ49t6BpeSvk5 oPVHVSo9KOE7gApLLVmx44dxycqqL/1Y6PG3gpOpfRPjYqekfpL7SZXWm57DI9MWC75+ /+4vo2nd8v5EEDdehJpIHOLn9swp8/TO9J9X8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vjK7ZqDaf9hbyWo17AvGDdRDRq+v405w29nMF9hdfgGnkp5EwAiFqNxx794ClwJl+T W+sEsVQQ51V1vKBcztxM15HLuKGFpl654xWuWDPPyhApZlxaQx/blUiBPob0zpYwsa6c JXZceRGal+BlYgISGoVjNTqD63I9BdZiDpdz0= Original-Received: by 10.229.225.196 with SMTP id it4mr4225780qcb.46.1281058915464; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.9.84 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:41:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C5B66DD.2060901@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128336 Archived-At: On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Jason Rumney wrote: > On 06/08/2010 09:28, Lennart Borgman wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Jason Rumney =C2=A0wrote= : >> >>> >>> When I search the web for information about Low Level Keyboard Hooks, >>> about >>> 80% of the results are about using them to override Alt-TAB behaviour. = =C2=A0I >>> find it curious that you claim this cannot be done as part of your >>> justification for moving Meta from Alt to the Windows key, when your >>> solution involves what would be the solution to the Alt-TAB problem. >>> >> >> That is interesting. Something might have changed since I did this - >> after all some years has passed and MS are now and then changing these >> things. Can you please give some links?\ >> > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/226359 > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc302329.aspx > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2490577/suppress-task-switch-keys-wink= ey-alt-tab-alt-esc-ctrl-esc-using-low-level-ke Thanks. I will test the last one and see. That is a recent article.