From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7771: 23.1; can't turn off font-lock-mode globally Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 23:04:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4D20CF4D.9010403@noir.com> <4D21180B.3050505@noir.com> <4D221813.9000600@noir.com> <83d3odojc8.fsf@gnu.org> <4D223199.2070307@noir.com> <83aajhoh6l.fsf@gnu.org> <4D224008.3080503@noir.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294093448 11357 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2011 22:24:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 22:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "K. Richard Pixley" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 03 23:24:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZsor-00056y-KF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:24:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51591 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZsor-0006xV-2q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:24:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42777 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZsoc-0006nt-3l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:23:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZsoa-0002SP-Rz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:23:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZsoa-0002SE-Oq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:23:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZsPi-0006lx-J4; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7771 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.129409187826022 (code B ref -1); Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jan 2011 21:57:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZsPc-0006lZ-Ou for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:57:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZsPb-0006lL-B4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:57:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZsWT-0008Bp-Q8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:51592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZsWT-0008Bg-NV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51625 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZsWS-0000JC-PZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:05:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZsWR-0008Ab-AP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:05:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:62955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZsWQ-0008AX-VO; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:04:59 -0500 Original-Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so3027290eyh.0 for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:04:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BICE7Ih9JGmm6/Sh7vmp5cuUAkzHPD98R1/vO6IlD6s=; b=toH9R7efaFXUk9LgJ/8rFuwKk4t2phkzyZi4AB7ib8VGGGw3Jdim5sRcbsMFIgKwb9 4k6krYhQjIY3eAUAynMP0Zs0CmMTbzQFqrh10BxrsXS3NecL60FAdlsbdhvL7cCPUQeL 7zm4kjPvAoSRuFV7KqwyZCBtsScfLwqbrd8go= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gg4PgcQOU4hT1UMFtP9U/ZbRDXb2w/8Cw3R3zPtDTvfC2rI1u0T2g83xzuuCeSfQxC u5jBwE+/m2baLNayUywprixSkUP4i5WVhwn5O92sExnvor0K/aeVN+LjITcr8d0IlzUO FPqURiShXS3Jux+5gdERwbG1JHhtfCw3grJPQ= Original-Received: by 10.213.10.75 with SMTP id o11mr775553ebo.71.1294092298009; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:04:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.20.148 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 14:04:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D224008.3080503@noir.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:58:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43069 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, K. Richard Pixley wrote: > On 20110103 13:02, Lennart Borgman wrote: >> > I have no complaint or problem with dimmed or bolded. =C2=A0Dimmed certai= nly > could become illegible if it were sufficiently dim, but it seems to be fi= ne > in most cases. =C2=A0Unlike, say, dim yellow text on off white background= which > is essentially invisible. =C2=A0Or red on green background or yellow on b= lue, (or > vice verse), which are completely invisible. > > Most programmers aren't color experts. =C2=A0They just slap up what seem = like > contrasting colors to them without much thought to subjective experience, > (color blindness, cognitive variance, environmental factors like X11 > themeing), color set themeing, look-and-feel coordination, pleasing > presentation, etc. > > Thunderbird uses color and I find their use of color constructive. > > It's low/no contrast color and "bad" use of color to which I object, (and > 95% of color uses are "bad", ime). > > I want the "bad" color to go away. =C2=A0And that seems to be primarily f= ont-lock > uses. Then perhaps the best solution would rather be a color theme adjusted to your needs? I mean in case that is possible to figure out on a more general level. Since you say that thunderbird seems to have done that it looks possible to me.