From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] (Or "question"...) isearch-kill-found Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 00:40:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87iq65v61m.fsf@gnu.org> <9BE2778D1026451087EED8E656851390@us.oracle.com> <4C02E48A.7080305@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275260544 26160 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2010 23:02:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 23:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 31 01:02:23 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIrWQ-0000lg-Ls for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 01:02:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56661 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIrBX-0004t1-7s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 18:40:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46859 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIrBN-0004qy-Si for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 18:40:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIrB9-0000jP-UF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 18:40:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f187.google.com ([209.85.211.187]:45401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIrB9-0000jG-Oz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 18:40:23 -0400 Original-Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so480340ywh.1 for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 15:40:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gMmXMZ3yyAp6uf6dUa17wa62H+O7/TEYPfWPAfwF7kQ=; b=YxCWkCaW/Av5smxNx50wa0ouCj0mnAbNi2vuoSL9/WlUxFiM/SxRL0LP+dB5RP0lqO U2FJsUVu0A8D2JgR+H51hX3F2VpGzdx9JBNxdCOFASEgXdxxqT4BiclOMpAjk/Obb5bh zZRC0HQQR/+RwJkLQIRlIWnN+2yFOTFClXFDw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mp3tH6n8y5UIVatAkqMhLprEhahGfnlKhnME9yuN+odHDYcJV+EPtzA3jmcKdJHOAb 9c3ifKTANm9v5Mjb4qghsEnW4y0rJNgJH6jzYoCZB4Gp5d+SilmxY5Uiy5RIHujmEFif es7CmasB+DGouQ/aySY2QamJxblmgTeb6nKWQ= Original-Received: by 10.100.245.4 with SMTP id s4mr3889626anh.224.1275259223110; Sun, 30 May 2010 15:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.44.20 with HTTP; Sun, 30 May 2010 15:40:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C02E48A.7080305@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125375 Archived-At: On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Christoph wro= te: > > In that same thread Davis Herring had an idea that sounds interesting and > useful to me: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-07/msg00492.html > >> =C2=A0Thinking about this, I realize >> =C2=A0that I would get almost all the utility of this idea with just one >> command >> =C2=A0added to isearch which meant "exit and move point to start of matc= h", or >> =C2=A0(closer to your idea) a command which meant "exit and drop mark at= start >> =C2=A0of match" in place of your toggle. =C2=A0WDOT? > > > I think a function "exit and drop mark at start of match" would be very > useful. Would it disturb if instead mark was always set to start of match?