From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key bindings proposal Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 16:04:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19537.40472.267000.563053@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <176EDAD3B9E54E39870FA3F84A5DDF3C@us.oracle.com> <19542.56658.583000.394397@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19544.1015.468000.280770@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280844313 23598 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2010 14:05:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 14:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uday S Reddy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 03 16:05:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgI7C-0001yS-9h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:05:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45411 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OgI7B-000528-Tf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44946 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OgI77-00051z-TY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:05:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgI72-0005ln-La for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41]:58274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OgI72-0005le-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:05:00 -0400 Original-Received: by pwi8 with SMTP id 8so3769769pwi.0 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:04:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=e5TIH9FBL0d9eXpSPKVZkyb57dwGyLdTmFbhjwbKb7A=; b=UyyUeosZDxY6xY9kMBUasH48KdHB5Lk2Q0f2QFsQQvUXncUwf3uZGaxDvYQS4U38Q3 qrRk0qfyA985N0NCs+Hzaz+9DsXK1i2OrmVXRFV/9MKZ52H5ru5VcYwKpbu5ZpeXZwkA uHXqzcy7QBPVgvtpfkF8QWvVn3iIqvUpT3ixI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TyT7i3gM0QupD9xZf4G7+JGdI0jiPH9w5AVJZf4hP0FHG6TSxpVYTFQVm/q8h5i33W N1wd7FOK/z8/GV212CZ8qQqnY2zWxtbP2E9RAu4KeZ82ooKvFQ/CbOlBe/phwI2quAmh kMPCvNw2pxy6pEqwG0cLf3dpV/4a9B3t1YWxI= Original-Received: by 10.142.174.4 with SMTP id w4mr6645157wfe.119.1280844299401; Tue, 03 Aug 2010 07:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.162.4 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 07:04:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <19544.1015.468000.280770@gargle.gargle.HOWL> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128191 Archived-At: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 13:56, Uday S Reddy wrote: > If people like Xah Lee or Lennart have to fork Emacs > in order to make it suitable to groups of users, then Emacs hasn't > lived up to its challenge. That's one possible interpretation. I don't think it is necessary to fork Emacs to make it appealing to Windows users, for example. Improvements can be made, of course. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma