From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bikeshedding go! Why is unbound? Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:58:38 +0100 Message-ID: References: <315B881CD79A43A9BABD5145EF4BFFE6@us.oracle.com> <34509A44D5C34DEE8812226B2CB83C93@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295308757 831 80.91.229.12 (17 Jan 2011 23:59:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 23:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, pj@irregularexpressions.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 18 00:59:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PeyyY-0003Yu-Rs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:59:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50485 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PeyyY-00062G-0P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:59:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36717 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PeyyU-000629-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:59:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PeyyS-0003QG-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:46454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PeyyS-0003Pw-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 18:59:00 -0500 Original-Received: by eyh6 with SMTP id 6so2833626eyh.0 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:58:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X/0e89hZW677bkGJECjUiXlgJK3nf4ca91t3cSednTc=; b=jOJGV9anM7vK3V9EX10IMo2N5vm/6gtq/6OmVTwNvMOzxrmd+NSSlyk8LuWsucHddz ffhSrdB16fEXBZ7pzVRf/JiTBiCQjzWeaSQqKwBOWloa7/tLIvDdipKC9TJZ1+jc+GuR 7igDCru+nc5rit6Ak0DtZVPKMjrJHHxiHAmaE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=M7+sunXxHYPjWhZd25raHvFtKT4d0DJEFWhshwpzCFXqmNpqUTfkJ8MeyRel3gc5Do WU4BXZmvZ1pLb4ZLOPtUdPVa5vzowdeH78ApPXPOI91zh39MXRzEqNmquC3hur3b5CJR PsOk2WEo1hzvQlgodGUKg+7ArlZPvU0RQzvgw= Original-Received: by 10.213.35.209 with SMTP id q17mr4551156ebd.97.1295308738835; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:58:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.20.148 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:58:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <34509A44D5C34DEE8812226B2CB83C93@us.oracle.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134674 Archived-At: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Drew Adams wrote: > > Testing whether a key is unbound is not the same thing as testing whether= an > unbound error is raised. =C2=A0The latter does tell you whether a key is = unbound, but > it also tells you that a key was invoked and an error was raised because = it is > not bound. I can't see that there is something like an "unbound error" when entering a key that it not bound. All I can see is a message saying "THE-KEY is undefined". How do you get that "unbound error"? I got the impression from this discussion that your code somehow depends on it.