From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reuben Thomas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8159: file-name-sans-version fails for some git files Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:39:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83zkpcx3ch.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299164111 8420 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2011 14:55:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8159@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 15:55:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv9vj-0003aM-H1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:55:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47690 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pv9vj-0000hE-85 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:55:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50390 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pv9vZ-0000aL-NA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:54:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv9vV-0007g7-1y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:54:53 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv9B4-0006Hv-Ry for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:06:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv8l9-0001jW-7E; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:40:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Reuben Thomas Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8159 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8159-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8159.12991595946637 (code B ref 8159); Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2011 13:39:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv8kz-0001j0-Is for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:39:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exprod7og116.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.219]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv8kw-0001ii-2r for 8159@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:39:51 -0500 Original-Received: from source ([209.85.161.48]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob116.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTW+aH4F0k0XnIrMEoo+fZXPaAFiiTDzt@postini.com; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 05:39:49 PST Original-Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so1213174fxm.21 for <8159@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 05:39:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.223.72.9 with SMTP id k9mr1466604faj.93.1299159572471; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 05:39:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.223.73.201 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 05:39:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:40:03 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44573 Archived-At: On 3 March 2011 13:36, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > If you are okay with having foo.js~ as a simple backup file name of > foo.js.~HEAD~1~ and foo.js.~3~ as its numbered backup, then I see no > issues here. =A0I just wonder if that would surprise git users (I don't > use it too much, so I don't know). Why would you have a backup of such a file? It's a file visited with vc-revision-other-window, which is by default read-only. The question arises equally for other VC systems, it's just that not all of them allow version numbers that contain tildes. --=20 http://rrt.sc3d.org