From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Avoiding slowdown in trunk development
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:54:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=Lw7yb2RjSJAjPUp4LWkqkdiOEaFCG1ARzUH2D@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D48594C.3070900@cs.ucla.edu>
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
>
> But that's not the case here. The special needs of the Windows port
> are not a good reason to slow down mainline development.
Every platform has it special needs. There is no running Emacs without
platform dependent parts.
> In that case, perhaps all that's needed is a minor adjustment in
> expectations. When Emacs's platform-independent parts are being
> changed, Windows developers can continue to expect Emacs to build.
> When the platform-dependent parts change, they can expect builds to
> fail temporarily, until someone who's versed in Windows adjusts the
> Windows build procedure. This approach is quite common in other
> projects, and it works for Emacs as well.
After reading this I am quite sure we need a policy for changes that
are known to break some commonly used platform. My suggestion is
(again) using a separate branch.
I can't see any solid reason in your arguments not to have a separate
branch for such changes. Maybe I am wrong.
You have said that it takes you extra time to have such a branch and
also that it takes a lot of time to do the merges. I have a hard time
to understand that so I ask you:
- What are the cost of an extra branch? Is there something that could
make this cost less?
- Why do you think that the merge will be difficult? I expect it to be
rather few changes at the locations where you are changing things. Is
not that your expectation too?
I got a lot of patches and some of them are unfortunately in parts
where things are changed and that causes me a lot of trouble
sometimes. However that trouble is less if I am able to merge more
often. With your suggestions I would be able to merge and build less
often so your suggestions would really cause at least me trouble.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-01 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-30 23:43 gnulib strftime imported into Emacs Paul Eggert
2011-01-31 4:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 8:02 ` Paul Eggert
2011-01-31 9:44 ` joakim
2011-01-31 9:59 ` Miles Bader
2011-01-31 10:16 ` joakim
2011-01-31 10:31 ` Miles Bader
2011-01-31 11:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 11:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 14:30 ` Tom Tromey
2011-01-31 14:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 19:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 22:19 ` Paul Eggert
2011-01-31 22:29 ` Lennart Borgman
2011-01-31 23:57 ` Paul Eggert
2011-02-01 0:15 ` Lennart Borgman
2011-02-01 0:24 ` Paul Eggert
2011-02-01 0:34 ` Lennart Borgman
2011-02-01 4:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-01 7:08 ` Paul Eggert
2011-02-01 8:58 ` Avoiding slowdown in trunk development (was: gnulib strftime imported into Emacs) Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-01 19:04 ` Avoiding slowdown in trunk development Paul Eggert
2011-02-01 19:54 ` Lennart Borgman [this message]
2011-02-01 19:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-02 16:52 ` Chong Yidong
2011-01-31 11:17 ` gnulib strftime imported into Emacs Lennart Borgman
2011-01-31 11:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 11:52 ` Lennart Borgman
2011-01-31 13:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 13:17 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-01-31 14:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 14:54 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-01-31 15:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 13:18 ` Lennart Borgman
2011-01-31 14:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 19:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 11:32 ` Andy Moreton
2011-01-31 19:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 14:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 16:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-01-31 20:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 20:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-01-31 19:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-31 23:25 ` Paul Eggert
2011-02-01 4:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-02-01 6:25 ` Paul Eggert
2011-02-01 8:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=Lw7yb2RjSJAjPUp4LWkqkdiOEaFCG1ARzUH2D@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=lennart.borgman@gmail.com \
--cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.