From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key bindings proposal Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:27:17 +0200 Message-ID: References: <19534.1494.627000.357123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <19546.47167.15000.439215@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87fwys7qao.fsf@telefonica.net> <87hbj8qvd9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87iq3k68ye.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874of466rj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pqxsbrie.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87k4nv7t72.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <19556.28233.750000.798692@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87aaoqjzge.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87mxsqzfam.fsf@telefonica.net> <87wrrue9sk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87iq3ez21o.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281911268 12243 80.91.229.12 (15 Aug 2010 22:27:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uday S Reddy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 16 00:27:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OklgA-00029B-Ca for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:27:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56265 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oklg9-0001kf-Lf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:27:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44107 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oklg3-0001kQ-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oklg2-0001GY-HZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:57122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oklg2-0001GU-DY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 18:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so1254144iwn.0 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:27:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NUP/I3sWFLpVsVZrznnN5533Mz3pP6tWy/+WA+8QVvI=; b=p870LFYAsOfyPMuqWrjVdcO2i3ta7R5csFgXL+rZ2l5h2CR7DMZrn4XX7LBaj4B7H7 DHwiDhYVwMfY4iLKh8I5xBXIhJXlXnzcwR+6Rk06fk5s3rOPZu5TkpA/I7PExdCBytsj Bxcn7+PYjLGlbbM+E31zQ8389q8Ljh8SpDtbA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=akRHCpTQly6HSKlB4PcRtgJpugA/UYs7dan+t75dXyuTgqSxzdZH9GgW1MsdKYr+5k 6Nhnxa12ScJp5mlAvSQTdYqg840xSA3vWMDJAf5paeshKN6BYGh/cfOOIIYMgzgU7UbZ By2yLXO5KlnrIJxXyR90HnGpmX++0Xz1sxaEc= Original-Received: by 10.231.35.10 with SMTP id n10mr4753540ibd.137.1281911257181; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.231.151.132 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:27:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128762 Archived-At: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 09:48, Uday S Reddy wrote= : > So, if > Yidong and Juanma can come back and tell us how to make that happen, we > would have made some progress. Sorry, but no. Lennart's the one that says that he's fixed the problem, and he's the one saying that his fix is not accepted. But the fix has not been sent to emacs-devel, or at least, if sent (a long time, as in several years, ago) the usual procedure to get such a patch accepted was not followed. So we're all waiting to see the patch again... =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma