From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:28:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> <83r5eb995g.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4k3976k.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290540648 3227 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 19:30:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 20:30:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKyZY-0000qe-Qq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:30:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56415 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKyZY-0006zh-Aj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:30:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41578 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKyYd-000500-Ry for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:30:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKyXx-00047D-Rb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:29:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:54525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKyXx-00046v-I4; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:28:57 -0500 Original-Received: by eydd26 with SMTP id d26so9942690eyd.0 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:28:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6EUm/4/OIAkmZhg3aVlf9hmsfE3uINbAOVACWreKEZs=; b=ZEmyAqA3HzZLsuTz2/ia3I21GwyfCDetXDnOCnb/ub7h++6RlSswpz6RxIF+yoSy45 8T0jolzjoMrQ2Zo4WuPRmEU7bpvn9o8yg8rzpGs+ecf/3McUzM7OAekEWNPpNqFbg1y+ hmPcqKTQVx+bLKifTutD4LuxT0uceqi0S3Xb8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=me+hx6siAZPGSe6PNobZPXBqUsW06nK/LLePJ6Tf8IMwwB8ydvML9f2ixCtOd9qvVT U0CHQti9boatOzAK0cNBSlZ9TVsCldi2EX92gzxNbi/v3rB5Ih+GF3ADAGF+C4Yb4IBd q6G3VVxPfX3KJCEScof3lUmGavBPefEhZsY0Y= Original-Received: by 10.213.28.131 with SMTP id m3mr2172743ebc.58.1290540533861; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:28:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.213.34.199 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:28:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83k4k3976k.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133074 Archived-At: On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Lennart Borgman >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:39:41 +0100 >> Cc: Sean Sieger , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> >> =C2=A0- Releases should or should not include debug info? >> > >> > It is IMO slightly better to ship the release without debug info. >> >> Why not ship to versions of the release binaries, with and without debug= info? > > Because it's pointless. =C2=A0If we want to give users release binaries > with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, period. Please explain why you think that.