From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Esa Peuha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7140: Browsing with gnus doesn't show moderation status Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 01:50:25 +0300 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65a02226274d2049181e776 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285888298 8526 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2010 23:11:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:11:38 +0000 (UTC) To: 7140@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 01 01:11:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1SHo-0000Z0-LG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:11:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45082 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1SHn-00021u-II for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:11:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56246 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1SHh-000217-VF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:11:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1SHh-0004FE-98 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:11:29 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1SHh-0004FA-6B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:11:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Rv0-0006Iw-7b; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Esa Peuha Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 7140 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.128588688024224 (code B ref -1); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2010 22:48:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Rux-0006If-EZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:47:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Rut-0006IS-PJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:47:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Rxc-0001S5-6d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:52068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Rxc-0001S1-4Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:50:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34727 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1RxV-0006qe-9l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1RxL-0001Pt-Df for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:50:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:57462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1RxL-0001Pc-9Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:50:27 -0400 Original-Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so3119169wyb.0 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:50:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kMzDUbt30f3jdBel/MRaWuPGaVDlE8SuX+mGJ8oEBl4=; b=hNwwcaR2Hcm6T2Py/RIy0Ef84S95y5Tt1a+nOSFoYclO3eda2NN5HCmYUr2/p2MmbD ay4sssrqESlOM8VqMj6rSBfMNxeU1pvfjrt8kLIZPJL5DBuHPXsHM7K3TD2Mntmno9zt tavtxrVfWbtX4TACRXFTndjtWK1O3yQC0Nvso= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=GZjUKno9Mn43EZhytNJFdTCBOWPtqylyNfSrA3sJzAFtO+Ly6yFvNG3cKfcRuTjJab mmhZJo8vxw73p9Mrzop/QR9vZS3SbPilyx8SPD4yWMND4B89Xc+1OvGjJQvjJKs6xVzi f9GiB0PXvTONfeN9Y5YQJnQIh8TRrV+Tp25Is= Original-Received: by 10.216.157.81 with SMTP id n59mr3668909wek.84.1285887025640; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.216.10.146 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:50:25 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:48:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40600 Archived-At: --0016e65a02226274d2049181e776 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 When browsing a foreign nntp server, gnus doesn't show the moderation status of groups. I think this should be changed, because knowing if a group is moderated is useful, and as the status flag is unavoidably part of a group's line in the active file, showing it should have only a negligible impact on performance. --0016e65a02226274d2049181e776 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When browsing a foreign nntp server, gnus doesn't show the moderation s= tatus of groups. I think this should be changed, because knowing if a group= is moderated is useful, and as the status flag is unavoidably part of a gr= oup's line in the active file, showing it should have only a negligible= impact on performance.
--0016e65a02226274d2049181e776--