Hey all,<br><br>I use 23.2 compiled by myself. Works just fine.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/11/12 Nerius Landys <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:nlandys@gmail.com">nlandys@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
I use emacs23-nox.  It runs in a terminal, but you get the antialiasing from the terminal it&#39;s running in.<br>I actually find the full emacs GUI to be very annoying.<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Maindoor <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:sanjeevfiles@yahoo.com" target="_blank">sanjeevfiles@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font: inherit;" valign="top">

Hi, <br>I&#39;ve been using emacs-snapshot for a while for anti-aliasing support.<br>But now since emacs itself supports anti-aliasing fonts, I&#39;m now<br>left with a dilemma, which one to use. <br>So next I went to find proof of which is latest and <span>bleeding edge</span>.<br>

and saw the version. emacs-snapshot is of course the <br>latest(23.1.50.1) <br>but uses the old GTK+ (2.18.0) version. The emacs package<br>version is older (23.1.1) but uses a newer GTK+ (2.20.0) version.<br>Can someone provide the pros and cons of each and which<br>

one might be better to use ?<br><br>Thanks.<br></td></tr></tbody></table><br>







      </blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>// Dmitriy.<br><br><br>