From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unconditional quit on SIGUSR2 Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:06:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4D90354E.9000704@gmail.com> <4D908F5F.8000303@gmail.com> <4D90C42F.9060500@gmail.com> <83bp0vrszf.fsf@gnu.org> <4D90E199.2040809@gmail.com> <83aagfrq1y.fsf@gnu.org> <4D90E661.40207@gmail.com> <4D90E7E7.7000101@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301343547 23794 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2011 20:19:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 28 22:19:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Its-0007yI-KZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:18:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59239 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4Ij1-00024T-AS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:07:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60103 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4Iie-0001uE-IY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:07:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Iid-0004Rl-FB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:07:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ey0-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:53608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Iic-0004RE-6m; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: by eyd9 with SMTP id 9so943238eyd.0 for ; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:07:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D4i3nLHhBgBxyVljROI4DcHdTLRXGKLLm8vWkDnPJ7U=; b=Hbgcol7kF73y9JHms0Wo2bxsml9UeS/JU+AGnYdlMujppgP/ShqEw/vntxqXFbVDOi ZxIwc5z1agS0BifwpCR+WPb0Yjwrb9PogVlESAiAG8wSa007SBYheIXmjWQc6pv696d/ I3AoAtddnwzsfYvAlHEqszH3vChK15AXrhfWg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mUMuMlrgyjAhGUiPHZS2/dC0cUX3ux4+LAtVO1fUZwtfLVf7NkMvjo57HFXIgkNXjA vxG0rA2920PtGtf4Xg4O6oZzTgdxEiG/aIjHY3kb6Y6j3L3YLzaJ2JHga7+QJKWFAbK8 YQ3U5oPATKjjBYZ0kLRAkbMPm276JIUD7tTZQ= Original-Received: by 10.213.110.17 with SMTP id l17mr1542771ebp.83.1301342837195; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:07:17 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.213.33.200 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:06:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D90E7E7.7000101@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.215.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137805 Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > On 3/28/2011 12:52 PM, Lennart Borgman wrote: >> >> But can't that be taken care of by letting font lock run again? > > It depends on how fontification is being run. =C2=A0If we're using jit-lo= ck, then > I believe we'll try again automatically. =C2=A0If we're using some other > approach, then fontification will likely just be canceled until the next > time that portion of the buffer is modified. =C2=A0There's also the issue= of > runaway process filters which I believe also run with quit disabled. Should not all new code use jit-lock for fontification (or the a bit misname fontification-functions)? Is there a lot of old code in Emacs not using jit-lock?