From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wojciech Meyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lisp/gnus/.dir-locals.el Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 21:07:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <83aanyhrnz.fsf@gnu.org> <5n1v95koyt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <837hiq5dh4.fsf@gnu.org> <83bp814l5x.fsf@gnu.org> <838w354f7i.fsf@gnu.org> <8362y94egs.fsf@gnu.org> <834odt4cd4.fsf@gnu.org> <8339td4a47.fsf@gnu.org> <19lj75ibdz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83zkvl2crg.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrqo2q1s.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbhq3k0x.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284581279 24810 80.91.229.12 (15 Sep 2010 20:07:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 15 22:07:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvyGm-000829-E0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:07:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49885 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvyGl-0003As-Rc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:07:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44296 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvyGg-0003Ah-0I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvyGe-0002h2-H8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:45255) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvyGe-0002gu-Et; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so288902gxk.0 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:07:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CpCPtGlvLRAQChRs9nO+85AJ2ZrzWkbJDzg5qvf91ro=; b=lU7qVbLBohs/twg0rwmJxhegc7CQLxFjo2XuXNv8nH5HA4mGhrU6ycJohovipm2LZV rfbAHBgF7+HIqwTrlj9smVNtoknciPR2TmeK/7RbK5hi0XKgWjsFptTecnorG0TI4CqR qkHs3Mzb/s34vy7m1QAfShAo7Gi7f6d4hxqfA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vqdPLYOyb7t3PKtver9xpedSg3R0i1NUW6Q6tLcmYZ3mHaxwm1fTaxzZbHNbQtKSQ+ 1HoX755fD3uA+DVOpxywRKHuQ5sJoYyp4f/+A30uMaGWV6Mky3monXplHWZmQ1Bd9D5t S8v2UI7K1SKwiLpVOOqIe0UweRs4uAhdXHuRs= Original-Received: by 10.151.141.1 with SMTP id t1mr2485332ybn.444.1284581263149; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.229.92.9 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:07:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83hbhq3k0x.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130233 Archived-At: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Juanma Barranquero >> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:03:23 +0200 >> Cc: Wojciech Meyer , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:50, Stefan Monnier = wrote: >> >> Non-simple, I suppose we could try to add an IF to exclude dotfiles or >> somesuch, but it won't be pretty I think. > > I would object to even think about such a possibility, let alone get > it into the repository. =A0All that to exclude a single file? > Let's sumarize: - windows does not hide dot-files - FOR globbing or any other globbing does not have exclude pattern - and there is no pattern to use file attributes - let's say it: windows globbing is too simple to handle this case (i would say Bash non extended globbing would be not sufficient). So I don't see a possible solution for it, unless it is changing an extensi= on, moving somewhere else to move back, cooking file lists, performing globbing ourselves, using Msys... etc. just mine 2 cents...... Wojciech