From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:39:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-86-1045986336" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267116026 16345 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2010 16:40:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "emacs-devel@gnu.org discussions" To: Andreas Schwab , =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 17:40:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkglA-0006l1-1j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:40:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43962 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nkgl9-0003DI-DH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:40:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nkgl2-0003D5-DC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55644 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nkgl1-0003Cv-Gc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nkgl1-0005sK-3Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.221.180]:59398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nkgl1-0005s8-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so1210279qyk.6 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:40:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-pgp-agent:x-mailer; bh=ds+Ld0oPZjTJMsAM/OPxFy57gM2vV8U3TwCVaZEoLSQ=; b=kjpSMryeT8uUyrEWdAHOW5Clrz3u92BpVDEkNmVBgkyIKMYEtswBcxYe04S9WR3qMB VfJulysrYdrRokvdAcTjjv3/ZDLMQM3BjaDIfs6IFkECO/qm/gv0qYqM2sKcsj3zVbUd gSAoBon7CtSrf/SYTzb936Tf2cm+bzGgS6qy4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-pgp-agent :x-mailer; b=uN28CYpNOfgKgQgoy6cRcD769In6G5eSzHA4HOS7iJg54+LqNbwrCUlIdwQpv+TZ26 DPOQ8U7fC25EeOVL6H2dmu3MVv7R8Pnc21xt2XBkVplHxleMw+xqlo4+ExDxLmAYKNjT vYdQMpaypDMaG/Wi1jXZgLVPg8L+n+x6XA6A4= Original-Received: by 10.224.102.18 with SMTP id e18mr1062108qao.172.1267116009707; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:40:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from cmu-365842.wv.cc.cmu.edu (CMU-365842.WV.CC.CMU.EDU [128.237.245.230]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 8sm270083qwj.25.2010.02.25.08.40.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:40:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.2.3 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121365 Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-86-1045986336 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Feb 25, 2010, at 11:24 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Would the equivalent of "git reset olderrevid ; git push -f" = inconvenience people very much? >=20 > Don't even _think_ about that! I hear you. The consequences get worse in proportion to the time span between the = faulty commit and the history manipulation. What happens if somebody checked in code for which permission hasn't = been obtained and can't be obtained? Suppose the copyright-holder = requests removal. =20= --Apple-Mail-86-1045986336 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkuGp+UACgkQYotoJUVQB4K9AACfdsUjRttKkT2AsNf+KjB8yHrg m/UAnjDKVVImmrVGn7XMHCPpZT49b1Ft =T9OL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-86-1045986336--