From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francis Belliveau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: ispell-buffer skips repetitive suspects after the first is accepted Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 19:01:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <837fskqvsr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431039699 13738 80.91.229.3 (7 May 2015 23:01:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 23:01:39 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 08 01:01:27 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YqUnG-00013E-Pf for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 01:01:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53071 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqUnF-00036I-Kb for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 19:01:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqUn6-00035z-2d for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 19:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqUn2-0007Vf-2N for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 19:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.44]:56490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YqUn1-0007UM-Rn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 May 2015 19:01:12 -0400 Original-Received: from resomta-ch2-15v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.111]) by resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id RB0P1q0062Qkjl901B1751; Thu, 07 May 2015 23:01:07 +0000 Original-Received: from [10.0.1.3] ([76.119.172.160]) by resomta-ch2-15v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id RB171q0033TzthY01B17GL; Thu, 07 May 2015 23:01:07 +0000 In-Reply-To: <837fskqvsr.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1431039667; bh=6TnrLuLXrfR4krswqDB1Mlitu3UT7Da1COW2Ai5u3jc=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=ifYdjRI4wdS7NEEHMxKwzdGJDU+b9YrhpHRFQHYK5RrW9Qz5loETXzhIZ6eFyNS4P EGb+L7A9NwAKJYlVUn5O/7IaziQTD859mlAS9ZOQq6/E2no7IbMHPdObxYgfP3rDfO DJ+bRETZzlYFZ+C77cIv/xTKZM7fWWcyt+HYlovjWLPPapxojLReiK4dq4jM0E8Swa aYJOrGCtVQi9VQoV7te0DL81uXcjee2GNA9w81LRIhbZLP8v/5gkfcoMqG6xdDQ7C7 0bDlyfJCk5C0u08L82r74CarAZki+x6AydNA2baUWMYlIvqvvEFbEngDhBMKjD/ZkV HoUdHQ5d5KMPQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 69.252.207.44 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:104282 Archived-At: This is clearly an intended feature. I am personally annoyed by the = inability to indicate something suspicious is valid for a particular = document. I do not want such things added to my dictionary because they = are likely not valid for other documents. That said I can understand how this would not be liked by all. If a bug = report is filed, I would hope that it is solved by configuration choice, = rather than just forcing everybody to accept it the other way. That=92s my opinion and I am sticking with it:-) > On May 7, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 >> From: J=FCrgen Hartmann >> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 10:14:21 +0200 >>=20 >> If a suspicious word is accepted once by pressing in an = interactive >> ispell-buffer session, all further occurrences of the same word on = the same >> line are skipped. >>=20 >> Here is an example: >>=20 >> Open an Emacs 24.5 session (it is the same with Emacs 24.4) by >>=20 >> LC_ALL=3DC emacs -Q >>=20 >> and enter the following line in the *scratch* buffer: >>=20 >> The term charset is short for charset. >>=20 >> Assume that the last word is a typo that should read "character set". = Now >> change the dictionary to american and run ispell-buffer. The first = occurrence >> of "charset" gets highlighted, but since it is correct here, we use = to >> accept it once an proceed. But oops... the spell-check finishes = immediately >> without giving us the chance to correct the second occurrence of = "charset" in >> that line. >>=20 >> Is this a bug or a difficult to understand feature. >=20 > Looks like a deliberate "feature": the comment there explicitly says: >=20 > ;; Do not recheck accepted word on this line. >=20 > Can't say I understand why, so feel free to file a bug report. >=20 >=20