From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6117: 24.0.50; dired-marked-face same as dired-flagged-face Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 08:20:46 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87ljbyt7jg.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273161976 20672 80.91.229.12 (6 May 2010 16:06:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 16:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6117@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" , Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 06 18:06:09 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OA3aS-0005XT-OA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 18:06:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48121 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OA3aS-0006ff-23 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 12:06:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1OA2xt-0003EN-Eg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 11:26:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54317 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OA2xn-00039Q-Bt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 11:26:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OA2xl-0003pU-T0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 11:26:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OA2xl-0003pP-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 11:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OA2tm-0004YH-FS; Thu, 06 May 2010 11:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 15:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6117.127315930717490 (code B ref 6117); Thu, 06 May 2010 15:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2010 15:21:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OA2tW-0004Y3-R1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 11:21:47 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OA2tU-0004Xx-C9 for 6117@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 11:21:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o46FLYFI030537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 6 May 2010 15:21:36 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt355.oracle.com (acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o46FLVkU008510; Thu, 6 May 2010 15:21:33 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt020.oracle.com by acsmt354.oracle.com with ESMTP id 219852541273159246; Thu, 06 May 2010 08:20:46 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 06 May 2010 08:20:45 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcrtLp4V1soscusnSSKwkD3QlP+yTAAAETig X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-Source-IP: rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.4BE2DE81.00A4:SCFMA4539811,ss=1,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 11:22:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:36743 Archived-At: > Agreed. And while there, please fix the docstrings so they say more > clearly what's different about "flagged vs marked". Yes, thanks. Some Emacs doc and source-code comments refer to deletion flags as "marks" (which they are), so it helps to always specifically say "flagged for deletion" instead of just "flagged". Then any ambiguity will arise only wrt the terms "marked" or (more likely) "mark", and that needs to be taken care of contextually. For example, Dired lets you use `* c' to change "marks", and in that context the `D' flag is considered a mark. Always associating "flag" with "deletion" will go a long way to making things clear.