From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: not good proposal: "C-z " reserved for users Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 14:55:11 +0200 Message-ID: <9ff9c549-0445-8e77-0375-ef74bfcc20ee@yandex.ru> References: <871rdk4c1m.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> <640551af-d035-f133-3b98-fe7c7a06279d@yandex.ru> <87im6u51o6.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1716"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: gregory@heytings.org, Robert Thorpe , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 14 13:56:34 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lBGwz-0000Ly-Kp for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 13:56:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42708 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBGwy-0007eG-Au for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 07:56:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBGvl-0007dW-SV for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 07:55:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::332]:55082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lBGvj-00046q-ML for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 07:55:17 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id w4so3793143wmi.4 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 04:55:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hSAYzMFokfBMmjUT3lsjdVV5Qkvs3jIA+NFLf/SkGKA=; b=B3F9BgswzbwXz71dBUbVLWOAy3GK6eslUkYL+OKSfzTQ9KwO9h1iMsDkUS4AAqACke sr4DvdzW4Xnt0BM5X7Y4ixvTI/7o6SQMUWLU4925B7ZAGL3//pD72NW+pK/019PuOl0b DGRdYrPJL0SsfdVwSldyTr6EvV09N2Wmet5x751eAyh0H7WDDlj+ukSx/7j7urVprgtg B0YE/K7lfbxn2DsjNG9kBGZwCWDoDk37s9J2637fq9/wdxET4NLbEOgTQMqNFPCm1Iy/ MIrLiHJkudsWdngD0oZLMxHIplb2VOIMS8ln85RXX0F9o9VQoC0bBdyQHUd1y4RAxQuS LrcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hSAYzMFokfBMmjUT3lsjdVV5Qkvs3jIA+NFLf/SkGKA=; b=TQxpd63/l3EMZZGtj1diFJal/HhRZb5XYuHO8kfeJ29EllMaxNG68OtcD+pMPHUpUN wCboq8pkLtOuJTd4RbWHZTK4NX0jw4n6wyxzFLI4UnSKC5oqBFm8F57IoViorx7BrtdR J2MueUPS91hOfQFs9sDym2JmVlCQfFHfUREODK8jXPZQAdYCGth+h4klkZEgrkTOEvT0 zCUYFBHCIcRKNaicYOOcJSnovz5ewfqN1cFlfk6qkSGVOj+oe3xvEq6x9YYqFYWgCZ6Z sL0BZgoh3Fp7w+Lqxld/QTW+9QrOONZlgTgqpS170DqcHfOEatnxLcAWTgNRyq0KTeGJ twNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iDRuTXlZYZn+M0IMtryVChXE+5inz2dp8H6+3VfXlSPXFXMnh U26jN9oEQSBzwg+Lyq9OXpJfAS9VwPs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGaORYT5ty8Q9QYsaYHVv6nbmKW46Zaa2ellzi+Ja7bJ+Tg68BQvTwarUrv+sORSC2TMIkqA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c355:: with SMTP id l21mr10447511wmj.61.1613307313621; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 04:55:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d10sm18860382wrn.88.2021.02.14.04.55.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Feb 2021 04:55:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87im6u51o6.fsf@posteo.net> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::332; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x332.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:128020 Archived-At: On 14.02.2021 13:28, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > We do have the raw data from https://emacssurvey.org/2020/, it is > possible to how these factors influence one another, but in the end, I > don't think that makes terminal Emacs usage illegitimate. I'm happy to accommodate terminal users in my packages, I'm just saying they don't necessarily use the terminal for its extra features, job control in particular.