From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net>,
Ken Raeburn <raeburn@permabit.com>
Cc: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>, 29165@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 06:24:04 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f1e7a1f-bfc0-43a4-9acb-cf69b85587be@default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87375r7f0g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net>
> It's not the byte compiler specifically, the defun* macro (aka cl-defun)
> expands &key into &rest, so the expansion has &optional &rest. At any
> rate, using &optional is meaningless there, so the solution is just to
> remove it.
>
> We should perhaps put something about throwing error on '&option &rest'
> into NEWS though.
I don't understand. In Common Lisp it is perfectly correct
to use both &optional and &rest. If Emacs's emulation of
CL's `defun' is defective in this regard, is that not a bug?
https://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/clm/node64.html
Or are you saying that there was a bug in Emacs 24's handling
of the CL `defun' emulation, where it expanded &key into
&rest, producing multiple &optional or &rest, and that now
this has been fixed - hence Emacs 24 byte-code does not work
in Emacs 26?
If you do add something to NEWS, please make clear just what
the problem is/was. Does Emacs now correctly emulate CL
`defun' wrt &* keywords? Is it an error to repeat &optional
or &rest? If not, what is the behavior in that case?
Whatever the explanation is, please make it very clear in
NEWS. Thx.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-06 6:57 bug#29165: 26.0.90; can't use some code byte-compiled under emacs 24 Ken Raeburn
2017-11-06 12:44 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-06 14:24 ` Drew Adams [this message]
2017-11-06 14:35 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-06 14:40 ` Drew Adams
2017-11-06 17:20 ` Philipp Stephani
2017-11-06 17:25 ` Ken Raeburn
2017-11-06 18:10 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-11-06 19:10 ` Ken Raeburn
2017-11-06 19:16 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-13 18:06 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-13 19:42 ` Ken Raeburn
2017-11-13 20:05 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-27 22:24 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-12-13 22:36 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-12-15 16:48 ` Glenn Morris
2017-12-16 4:54 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-01-20 22:10 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-01-21 3:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2018-01-21 16:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-01-21 16:30 ` Noam Postavsky
2018-01-21 18:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-03-25 15:32 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-12-13 23:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-15 1:16 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-12-15 3:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-15 5:17 ` Ken Raeburn
2017-12-15 13:54 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-11-06 19:31 ` Drew Adams
2017-11-06 16:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f1e7a1f-bfc0-43a4-9acb-cf69b85587be@default \
--to=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=29165@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=p.stephani2@gmail.com \
--cc=raeburn@permabit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.