From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61514: 30.0.50; sadistically long xml line hangs emacs Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:11:45 +0000 Message-ID: <9e9ed8043fedf8471ab5@heytings.org> References: <87lel0c65v.fsf@everybody.org> <0f053182b05e84d6251e@heytings.org> <6ec29aa7157c40ce76e9e0cf1a6351871e16ecd7.camel@everybody.org> <9e9ed8043f6ceff84cfc@heytings.org> <87h6vntef0.fsf@yahoo.com> <9e9ed8043f2db866e3ba@heytings.org> <87cz6btd3q.fsf@yahoo.com> <9e9ed8043f2342b86537@heytings.org> <874jrntac6.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40878"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "Mark A. Hershberger" , 61514@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 13:12:39 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pSGeN-000AQy-Bf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:12:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSGds-0004Jw-0t; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:12:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSGdq-0004JX-9D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSGdm-0008VY-BN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:12:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSGdm-0001tg-6W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61514 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61514-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61514.16764631097246 (code B ref 61514); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61514) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2023 12:11:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSGdY-0001so-Jq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:11:48 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:57892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSGdW-0001se-Rs for 61514@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 07:11:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1676463105; bh=zL4bNT6GoOjzIne3emh5Az/rNJspkbk6vaLaahkRfWA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=kXrwpfSRUtlIZDNRtuw171j2ruUSSjK68zbkouq1JSLt3OmjN4Kx7KHUL9PBKUYgq ZO4iPbLDE3wzokkJwIhh748xxibFyAj4ZrkD040n//B6Q7i19FLf7wws1/LumV/Jan wR9Avb06UMepwc0gEfpM2W9smXXxiORdICOLLPiXpmE1HZ4lkp5SZU6UQEfAjdt11d sCAe4pknXVckAaj4oOS+8bxq7yg61qpP6m+5tm7ABJeKPVLTCM3j8ozYrhhSMkxA2u wm7Q6ylOlBGfA7RvAgOLvO2W9P9H/lVVnzYUaEmmvjf3KmMmdT5Hsv6k2RpybiNyBs YvbAA7aIsCThQ== In-Reply-To: <874jrntac6.fsf@yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:255682 Archived-At: > > Here is what you said: > > Nobody is saying that there is no bug here. I was only pointing out that > the bug is not "in Emacs", it is in the fontification routines of a > specific mode. If you turn fontification off, you will see that Emacs 30 > behaves much better than Emacs 28. > > or, simplified, > > "Nobody is saying that there is no bug here. There is no bug in Emacs." > That is your (very) personal interpretation and "simplification". > > Now, people will think we will not fix bugs in nxml. > Was this bug perhaps marked as "not a bug" or "won't fix"? If not, why would anyone think that "we will not fix bugs in nXML"? Now, if you have something to contribute to diagnose or fix this bug, please do. If you don't, I don't see what the point of your posts is.