From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61514: 30.0.50; sadistically long xml line hangs emacs Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:41:04 +0000 Message-ID: <9e9ed8043f2db866e3ba@heytings.org> References: <87lel0c65v.fsf@everybody.org> <0f053182b05e84d6251e@heytings.org> <6ec29aa7157c40ce76e9e0cf1a6351871e16ecd7.camel@everybody.org> <9e9ed8043f6ceff84cfc@heytings.org> <87h6vntef0.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23534"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "Mark A. Hershberger" , 61514@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 11:42:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFEu-0005rk-48 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:42:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFEk-00078G-Mg; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:42:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFEh-00072I-6U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:42:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFEg-0000aD-Tw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFEg-0007U4-3r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61514 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61514-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61514.167645767228694 (code B ref 61514); Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61514) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2023 10:41:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57900 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFDr-0007Sj-LO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:41:11 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:57776) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSFDm-0007SX-8w for 61514@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 05:41:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1676457664; bh=d6g52Mqlo6jFQkNYL1YLd+Emt3LU6qxYP66QMIJtbLU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=cFgsfSxd6am3cypJ/xuexe0qIvX5/myyXn2uXn14ToZwPyeud7yJHBJOOb4CvB7DV TClWVBF6onLtz9SbVgk+k4WYkFjems1TqbhvaJNLeBGluS9XdvC2IeWqjFkWyB6RPe YBZYw74fLxm7ZAQkcLSWI5T13ZqnuGdEIv/KmTqoDOGIHYTq7WXYSASlQTP0XmNsV6 9WHBgGxYHMsr8GD5PYY+TPm+B2UPdCAOIY0iMvpNW68G0OWemERIM5RUpC6bdxbLPV pzGC3+/2U+efxXTHN59gCi1rnkoBz1Z9HC9TpKoEVZmBVniCUsJXe2U4TBZ+lqIwLn 1f8PwRUUBdqdQ== In-Reply-To: <87h6vntef0.fsf@yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:255675 Archived-At: >> Nobody is saying that there is no bug here. I was only pointing out >> that the bug is not "in Emacs", it is in the fontification routines of >> a specific mode. If you turn fontification off, you will see that >> Emacs 30 behaves much better than Emacs 28. > > And when that mode is part of Emacs, the bug is in Emacs. > That remark misses the context and the point.