From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: gnuist007@hotmail.com (gnuist) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Need general info on common lisp, opinions sought Date: 3 Oct 2002 05:36:21 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <9e8ebeb2.0210030436.7d87eee@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033713573 5956 127.0.0.1 (4 Oct 2002 06:39:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 06:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17xM7U-0001XP-00 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:39:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17xLkq-00023U-00; Fri, 04 Oct 2002 02:16:04 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!nntp.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help,gnu.utils.help,comp.lang.lisp Original-Lines: 10 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.179.38.34 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1033648581 15003 127.0.0.1 (3 Oct 2002 12:36:21 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Oct 2002 12:36:21 GMT Original-Xref: nntp.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:105668 gnu.utils.help:4071 comp.lang.lisp:95356 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:2239 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:2239 Is it good to have the following line in .emacs file? (require 'cl) Is it going to cause any tradeoff or only pure additions? How is common lisp different from emacs lisp? Where is the documentation on linux system? Is it more than it or less than emacs lisp? Which should I use and why? I need info on people's taste on this subject. Opinions sought!