From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fabian Ezequiel Gallina Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fwd: CEDET sync Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:07:28 -0300 Message-ID: <9de1a5ef1003011407w11642f58ia72a91a8466b8fa@mail.gmail.com> References: <86bpf7q3fc.wl%lluis@ginnungagap.pc.ac.upc.edu> <87wrxvyijr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267481264 7451 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2010 22:07:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 22:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs?= , "Eric M. Ludlam" To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 01 23:07:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmDm6-0005IB-GI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:07:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38134 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmDm5-0001HP-Uh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:07:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmDm0-0001FD-Tb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45198 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmDlz-0001DM-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmDlz-00025k-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:07:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:64896) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmDly-00025d-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:07:31 -0500 Original-Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so128003wwb.0 for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:07:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=x4ewTrMIeYTm6bOV0MAK9WlH3MiYzf4GvHM/CYCQ1Kg=; b=hze/tJkZEBt04FmIJpr5ZqU5pp8YA6p4WYNL/mGafx0uV4ToqzpdvvAFfc3RSpDm2c aPqjDaUNwb5zaN+BXKZdyPDmOVVLRnnyf3DWWPlrqFeUGyuJ6syJqDoTYt57v6NDE1io dTmOGARg8hBzEF9hqMytxff9wBH7eJpzXZPTE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ahMid5SxP7eFxRrBWw+nRBEWbuaHZVwz9VdCigy9k+sKsswVEvB1LTlDVvNxuWhamJ 3e4eG3EWQ/YBi0nttqILkxbr2VjqYxiRDN0KzudlPGObC9c8iaKOaZvPz+vQgJ1DWHRo nLRRthWG3INlocH9YnFLhm9XYJX2xgLcEbdnE= Original-Received: by 10.216.88.206 with SMTP id a56mr3263836wef.64.1267481248704; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:07:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121518 Archived-At: 2010/3/1 Stefan Monnier : > > I really don't like that smell. =A0We need to make sure the two code-base= s > evolve in-sync, which won't work as long as we keep "gratuitous" > differences between the two (file names and things like that). > > I thought Eric was to incorporate most/all of the changes we made into > his version. =A0If this doesn't take place real soon, it'll become much > too painful to maintain. > Right now because of the incompatibilities between both versions of CEDET I installed the main project's CVS one and I'm using just that. >From my user point of view, these incompatibilities are quite annoying and keeping things that way will probably make the merge useless and people will prefer to install CEDET by themselves anyways. Best Regards, --=20 Fabi=E1n E. Gallina http://www.from-the-cloud.com