From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30285: dired-do-chmod vs. top line of dired Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 13:52:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9de0a90c-c99d-4fc7-9cfa-f1dbe336c801@default> References: <87mv0wg80c.fsf@jidanni.org> <87efm8snnr.fsf@gmail.com> <83efm8irac.fsf@gnu.org> <87d11sl08v.fsf@gmail.com> <87fu6lwxxu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87k1vwcwy1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5620cf82-9402-4895-bdd1-fdf5401c8172@default> <871si475qh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87tvuvwvzb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1517867791 6454 195.159.176.226 (5 Feb 2018 21:56:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 30285@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Juri Linkov , Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 05 22:56:27 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiokD-0000HL-5g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 22:56:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiomE-0004vI-JA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 16:58:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40773) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiom7-0004uM-BD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 16:58:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiom2-0003D8-De for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 16:58:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiom2-0003D1-9A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 16:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiom2-0006wX-2Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 16:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Drew Adams Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 21:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30285 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30285-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30285.151786786326664 (code B ref 30285); Mon, 05 Feb 2018 21:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30285) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2018 21:57:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59128 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eioli-0006w0-Ov for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 16:57:42 -0500 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:60782) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiolg-0006vl-JN for 30285@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 16:57:41 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w15Luw7d089109; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:57:34 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2017-10-26; bh=ciyuSSHeUwyjzLOnGTp06xFxSxIb+sliOYg11iugUF0=; b=GgHu1J8neuNWTcRmv4BnezIgGsmx8rsrgq/0rtNJgAKV64cNBSdEcYYANGWSE+0No9aX GZ8McesfXkrePcUXrUWSzzbe9AHfYRV47s2hYZwg7Knw4gBR5uQcOec97TWaR3P4i8Rw dNsbKsxiULqVvbYfd2S1Z1+kfs4tNSP0DrtKuXGDwh4MTrTOO79QTYLPkIxY+GkRC9SA rVMAfSXM8s6ECz3nUSZYk3sgaxFphPXmvVUehMqSDdNdQ4ImDE4BJ32Qx+uWBSArZIsM ndhTbiTNLJtmQNia6KIwP0uU3kZDrpEyuhaeyeBVYOQX+ZQNw4v0v1NtBrftGiYJv6Qc 3w== Original-Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2fxyhqg1we-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 05 Feb 2018 21:57:34 +0000 Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w15LqVZx021157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:52:31 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w15LqT53002628; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 21:52:29 GMT In-Reply-To: <87tvuvwvzb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4639.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8796 signatures=668662 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1802050270 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142953 Archived-At: > > Is it too much ask you to read my commit messages in case you dont > > have time/motivation to test my patches? Then, you dont need to > > rediscover things already reported by others. Thanks. >=20 > Where did you get the idea that I don't read your patches? This is > not true. =20 I'm guessing that Tino replied to you after getting angry by my message saying that I didn't have time to read his patch etc. I imagine his frustration was not really directed at you. If so, that's understandable, even if you might not have deserved it. Just a guess. > I really appreciate all fresh ideas that you bring into development, and > your tireless efforts to implement them. Thanks for all your > contributions! Ditto - for both of you, in fact.