From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bug spam
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:42:17 -0500
Message-ID: <9aljft968m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <878wc1h524.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<tby6k18pd0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <874omph4f0.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<87pr5dmqfw.fsf@red-bean.com> <877hrl1m5m.fsf@telefonica.net>
	<86hbqpctyh.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvmy0hs3hh.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<f8fx69l0r7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwv3a283efx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<etpr5chanb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<19279.20828.784450.411540@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwv7hrkzg7p.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<x71vhs3tmt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <ljbpgphpon.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87fx61c2r5.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263933756 32551 80.91.229.12 (19 Jan 2010 20:42:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 19 21:42:28 2010
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1NXKuC-0005fS-3O
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:42:28 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53759 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NXKuC-0000Yh-W9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:42:29 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NXKu7-0000WM-BR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:42:23 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NXKu2-0000Rl-O3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:42:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38566 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NXKu2-0000Ra-Jj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:42:18 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:55308)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rgm@gnu.org>) id 1NXKu2-0000Yb-De
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:42:18 -0500
Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <rgm@gnu.org>)
	id 1NXKu2-0003V4-1f; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:42:18 -0500
X-Spook: virus Waco, Texas SRI assassinate fissionable SWAT threat
X-Ran: U(*Vs+""`zl+w30vIY"Q;Vv':]X~#!PvuM_mZ7|+??PHQe@z-/GgCT<XGR7JCjlx0f'YMi
X-Hue: black
X-Attribution: GM
User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120243
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/120243>

Chong Yidong wrote:

>> Somebody seems to have added a mailman auto-discard rule for
>>
>> ^[0-9]+.*@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
>>
>> I wondered why there were suddenly so few moderation requests...
>
> It was not me.  I'm not sure we should add this filter, because it may
> interfere with follow-ups to old bug reports.

I agree with you. Such addresses were in use as recently as 3 days ago
(eg in bug#5042).