From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Brand new clojure support in Emacs ;-) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 16:53:38 +0300 Message-ID: <9a94ddd5-328e-022a-2c5a-9d517dd4375d@gutov.dev> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87a5uw9ivs.fsf@posteo.net> <87ttt42gna.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmy080kn.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8djcydl.fsf@gnu.org> <87350ndquw.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83350ncbns.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyzrjbd8.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87zg2hsyrd.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87h6ontwfv.fsf@posteo.net> <835y4ucrz3.fsf@gnu.org> <831qficgin.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26343"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cc: rms@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 15:53:59 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4az-0006Wu-8b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 15:53:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4ar-0003uE-Oa; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:53:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4ap-0003sw-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:53:47 -0400 Original-Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4al-0004Ne-UO; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:53:46 -0400 Original-Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5739E32006F5; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 09:53:41 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:53:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1693576420; x=1693662820; bh=DiD8wfGotjTf/cxjCNn3I2VlCtSRHrRV4Ms au1I9On4=; b=gr5lofOvP5pOZc3TkN3xKRhqY53yDvcSXS0GGPIfCMyBBPFtKR3 Aa+3NyMYAshLNDHZRH+wxeUoiuskdMBBZ6X1ggvkp02fue0A9DMEBef9OhypbXvh LGMytSlo1m2/CY9aIKhzXmd6zW7K3WdJq4OZvsRQSoY9/Su/+Q2XiXkNEI3WZIsm i7h4IlQRJpXY3WNMOW5LcKWoNxiiv5B8iPkB9R2ifboeIXg4lZciZUrHJNyA97nw OuJvC4f67k1zNUr3YOfCWlVNKLZdKBPkaL2K2FbbYKPi8rXMabL1pbIUYQ+WFgZz 2wUih/PSc9KNydRdgg7wZyhtlmE265Zi+/w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1693576420; x=1693662820; bh=DiD8wfGotjTf/cxjCNn3I2VlCtSRHrRV4Ms au1I9On4=; b=NTDWyWzCVyjxodEDDC4x6qVirFk3G71twPUk48Kxg+JO1fI84IV hWS1U9HVMV4zd11l5zz42y5p7Zx5qb+cDlXGyHuvkBhDyllZmIX2jwWoaRVqfbjI /1hPUbcrwHx9nmfFHtPMroSrHmXT0rhXI6jeK9TJPnmKe48vbxqTyd2HZI/GgxXn 5ZokLuRaRu7i7mTbrw4ZWbhjmwZAokA/bNaExAKF3nnQa6jtTyc0kEOcGsleud+R J/cbKz5ViSXwRjSEB7d+5SxqaHEYCLfBqCMhzsA+NtLoQ0lUHWpoKP7+INLiJGOr Ymj+0awBCRcfUHffkyp+QSMWwvDZMxP06UA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrudegvddgjedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeffmhhi thhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepiefgteevheevveffheeltdeukeeiieekueefgedugfefgefhudelgfefveel vdevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug hmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 09:53:39 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <831qficgin.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=dmitry@gutov.dev; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -62 X-Spam_score: -6.3 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.478, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309797 Archived-At: On 01/09/2023 13:52, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>>> They don't >>>>> think in terms of what is best for Emacs >>>> What if they do? >>> If they did, they would have agreed with us, or at least said they'd >>> like to. >> But we don't always agree between ourselves. Not on this subject anyway. > Those disagreements are not relevant when the issue is the inclusion > of a package in core. So... are you also going to claim that any author of a package who doesn't want the inclusion of it (or some other package, or sets of packages) in the core Emacs, necessarily "doesn't think in terms of what is best for Emacs"? And that any disagreements are "irrelevant"?