From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38354: 27.0.50; Implement display action display-buffer-in-tab Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:05:28 +0100 Message-ID: <9a4ded52-68ea-809a-43b4-066d65fd7978@gmx.at> References: <87imna2nsi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8736ea5kcz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <7979be54-2a01-2e97-d956-2500e7999e26@gmx.at> <87d0dd3yb7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r21r389g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87lfrvk7cg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <6be9eb15-062d-b15f-04c8-993a2a2eee22@gmx.at> <87h82i9tvd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pnh5m16o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <6fbb734e-2fce-c148-0387-8cbe9bba649c@gmx.at> <87k17bn1q8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="160280"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 38354@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 05 10:06:39 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1icn5q-000fWZ-1v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:06:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51774 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icn5o-00053N-MZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 04:06:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icn5I-0004tf-LU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 04:06:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icn5H-0003Fd-Fv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 04:06:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icn5G-0003Ek-N4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 04:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icn5G-0004wQ-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 04:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 09:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38354 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38354-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38354.157553674018932 (code B ref 38354); Thu, 05 Dec 2019 09:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38354) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2019 09:05:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42984 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icn4u-0004vH-0M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 04:05:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:55607) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icn4r-0004uy-NV for 38354@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 04:05:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1575536728; bh=2twZe0uuLrten3LNKXquw3fJD3Qzgi5zGcdoKs7fk60=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gdTs9L1pTRJg721aV5+B2GjUfimX68mE5/KR+pYGHz0arnFsxV86dZCf+wSJihDMe 0xXHOuzXlM5Hyx7fs9JhjurcCIoNfJwbUYlG1K5z/jqZS9cb6ixiKSCV8fDOrCdZ2Y 0XOU+ie04f0CinZMb8daqOn/bn57LYFONF/noNQI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.161]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MV63g-1iE0w22QKs-00S38W; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:05:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87k17bn1q8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: de-AT X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ZfI1FtwVz3+kuDDRgxXfLx8NIq0poNJ/iBPqUB5zNGtwL5KmeMU 9CKvWOY8gZf4k+4vaFj0xo3384DJkEKH8qE4J0paa1Ou4AU+ERR3Dq1YXXFnqU92pBCDWjB uxKmzNjQJ1lS3E5lUy0UeV/LTd3PBx3Gx3cAed39zIOsuUMSFtO3kn//SbDCRz3/oxSpKjC TKs/hhiLidqyslCfIfklg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:+uhC6k4PpKo=:xC93AMwuJpf6nL/YkMtu0O VqI+QxTpJv5sachJo/CJ2QEBAz+/kSUlL4s4livFNArtua4SxAh9iOd6Q3TSYVR/cbN1otvWJ vN91ZMHOOct2+Zhb98ZpZIMTD1KI9BFeOuCcwhUY+14W864JObjrKpbWia2yL+VaNqGCRKe1h YVipWl8o/QDKQ/2a+r8CukDzp6kBf3c1aekfCMwelzJ5F1YcueRVhl2X6SN100xRWWuhFrqD4 8GesA3SeHdoFzWpayXEl6h8dlnUbfoYcGegMIXEmHMtDktUXmSHmHsncTzXOABW6W4K/bkYuz cWT4xkYISIEABUrUoMEGmiyi3HvJ/zERDy+bQyBZ5eLG+Q3dEyPSRaK2kCK50nXjZvrRyD5io wmqB4Y6Lj7AVrhsWGPWvvC2uSp1GNFHBPL1wrzTqu7GoB/2fiU59SjK9OBrcBgk0ySBm2O6Yr 2sE2ypFX2leWVEu7YV/MFG6JzeHh1N0VjXcMj6ROYSIIuWJjSDXMVxaRXycF7jWMhtfB7GhiT jtkeXfQPki44kSYvpT8VCuB+gNHBIcB7gPz+G/I5puouuwe874yhmKHJExSbOICEaqpi5uxl7 GjiaR9Nm6I7g8p1aruWGv86RykV/pbdNN0GFZkXHyvwQEUUgJBO7nQ4O2Ms8hpP9TsJmC7zi7 yAtKgBmgY741kKvIdi7BJv3mHpUGRtT6uh5j+/0N7TRWRtqc12jn6hIWOKH8Mul054h9SS2Ll uDCVKDpUFDfA+nJlYC8bO1iKV/mox8Uef8uImix34D/q0/bi1vINM2t99aqR9dSEQc4HTOMG X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172876 Archived-At: > I have no preference, but don't understand why the implementation > should provide only one way, but not another. Is it what users expect? IIRC that's how we interpreted the term "reuse" in the past - do not change configurations if we can avoid it. But I have no preference either. > It should close the tab only on quitting the window with the buffer > whose displaying created the tab. For example, when > 'switch-to-buffer-other-tab' creates a new tab, then quitting > its buffer should close the tab. > > This is the same logic as for creating/deleting the window, e.g. > 'C-h f car RET' creates a window, but typing 'q' in Help buffer > deletes the window. 'q' in a new tab should close it as well. OK. But what if another action adds something to such a tab and we then quit the window. Or is such a scenario impossible? martin