From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11939: 24.1; `save-buffers-kill-emacs' loses minibuffer focus whenit calls `list-processes' Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:26:57 -0700 Message-ID: <9E8DDE70EE6047779A17AA79E42D0FBA@us.oracle.com> References: <5007E47B.3050907@gmx.at><446B437450EC47968D15C20D7142296B@us.oracle.com><500A8C0E.4040006@gmx.at><96A974694CF64567A3EAB85185AB3A5C@us.oracle.com><500BBE6F.6020007@gmx.at><1403DD3D67534F53BC023CC99A258DF5@us.oracle.com><838veb209m.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4s2zcp9.fsf@gnu.org><81CFBB36FDCB4CD6B3762F9E00AC8290@us.oracle.com><83fw8iz7et.fsf@gnu.org><60948DD3935D452F85F95174474D06E9@us.oracle.com><838veaz34x.fsf@gnu.org> <83629blssa.fsf@gnu.org> ! <5011116B.4010106@gm x.at> <32A934E820BA4853B84229C32F7145A1@us.oracle! ! .com> <50116AD9.706 09@gmx.at> <548032D12CE14E3689257D609E93482F@us.oracle.com> <501175C9.3090803@gmx.at> <2F76545DBD0C4F199A60F4B750709112@us.oracle.com> <5012362A.7070200@gmx.at> <4FB29D967D524DA99545D98266DD74B4@us.oracle.com> <501540D0.50900@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343579278 10321 80.91.229.3 (29 Jul 2012 16:27:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11939@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'martin rudalics'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 29 18:27:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SvWLV-0002wO-Qv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:27:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59910 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvWLU-00027J-Uh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:27:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52767) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvWLT-00027E-26 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:27:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvWLS-0007Pt-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:27:55 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SvWLR-0007Pp-VS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:27:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvWSM-0007eS-3q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11939 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11939-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11939.134357966329362 (code B ref 11939); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11939) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2012 16:34:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48938 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvWRj-0007dX-2z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:20692) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SvWRh-0007dP-2f for 11939@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 12:34:21 -0400 Original-Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q6TGR9gr017979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:27:10 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6TGR8Rj005146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:27:09 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt117.oracle.com (abhmt117.oracle.com [141.146.116.69]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q6TGR8SU017109; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:27:08 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/71.202.147.44) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:27:07 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <501540D0.50900@gmx.at> Thread-Index: Ac1tkdhJROt88xAFSbmd1PpEbT7rcQAE/dWg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62567 Archived-At: > Are you stuck in the minibuffer window even when you do `top-level'? I don't know what you mean by "stuck in the minibuffer window. After the command I am at top level. And I am in no way stuck in a minibuffer window. The problem is that the `current-buffer' is " *Minibuf-0*". That's all. > > The problem is (apparently) that the minibuffer buffer > > remains selected after the reading, i.e., the (current-buffer) > > is " *Minibuf-0*". Thus, a subsequent command such as `C-x k' > > sees that buffer as the current one. That has not > > happened before - it seems to come as a result of redirecting > > the frame focus, but perhaps that is just a catalyst/revealer. > > If this were the case, we'd have a bug. But the code doesn't > indicate that. Not sure what "this" you are referring to: "it seems to come as a result..." or the behavior that "the (current-buffer) is " *Minibuf-0*"." I do not know what the cause is. I was only wondering out loud whether it somehow comes as a result of redirecting the focus. But what is clear is that (current-buffer) is " *Minibuf-0*".