Re: Objective C coding style

["Jan Djärv" <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>]

Hello.

12 jul 2012 kl. 18:52 skrev Samuel Bronson:

> 
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 5:15 AM, Jan Djärv wrote:
> 
>> Hello.
>> 
>> 12 jul 2012 kl. 03:15 skrev Samuel Bronson:
>> 
>>> I've noticed that the Objective C code of the NeXTstep port doesn't have a very consistent style.  I expect this is something to do with the fact that (standards.info) doesn't cover Objective C.  Would it be appropriate to adopt the GNUstep coding style?
>> 
>> How does that style look?  Is it "compatible" with the GNU C-style, for example w.r.t. braces?
> 
> Yes.  The GNUstep coding standards make normative reference to the GNU coding standards, summarize some of the more important rules, and lay down rules regarding the additional constructs and namespaces found in Objective C.
> 
> For example, they dictate where the whitespace should go in method signatures, how message expressions may be indentented, and how classes and methods are to be named.  There are a few GNUstep-specific rules (like prefixing GNUstep-only class names with GS), but those are easy to spot and ignore.
> 
> You can take a look at <http://www.gnustep.org/resources/documentation/Developer/CodingStandards/coding-standards.pdf>, or at <http://www.gnustep.org/resources/documentation/Developer/CodingStandards/coding-standards_3.html> and <http://www.gnustep.org/resources/documentation/Developer/CodingStandards/coding-standards_7.html>.

I think it would be a good addition, but I guess it is up to the cc-mode developers.  There is currently no ObjC-style in cc-mode.  But ObjC is not well handeled by cc-mode (c-defun-name does not work at all with ObjC for example), so I am not optimistic.

Another question is if it should be the default for just the Emacs project or globally.

	Jan D.