From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:45:30 +0200 Message-ID: <9925174d-421a-04ae-f833-5a4cf10d7fd4@yandex.ru> References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> <834lma6xo7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1519250776 1238 195.159.176.226 (21 Feb 2018 22:06:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:06:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, chris.w.feng@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 21 23:06:12 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocWg-0008PF-WA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:06:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34975 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eocYi-0000S1-UN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:08:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eocXg-0008PE-EJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:08:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eocWc-0007kx-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47080) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eocDF-0007nj-CJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:46:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocDC-00058W-5x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:46:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23980 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23980-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23980.151924954319712 (code B ref 23980); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 21:45:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54977 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocCt-00057s-1k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:45:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-f181.google.com ([209.85.128.181]:37516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocCq-00057f-NX for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:45:41 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-f181.google.com with SMTP id z12so8550812wrg.4 for <23980@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:45:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qUNwbGdtPejkxCILAJgrl/pKxTIMT8mHXMhsmTUBd+4=; b=BUtg9SEJ8CP4JpV9RlYfZ6yLty/4+pBWTtpbXgmX1tLmO4v4yKvQ/B1b5ETqf1qocS Aw+O/nc6rK+DFJ/hV+jkp4YOaaSuN91ztGGO9D5+Fknif2y9c1MHmYZmKI01Qzf1q8Zx wc7sNZdsZTDxzj94A/fRMkJ2l2o4covf0Rl4rSJaDxETvUcHmPdtCczWZuwtQTMHUZpG CzyRU1QBvwCdwWygG5Cu8f2i3CqQFXNAM9lLnkhqV/Lr0X7HJR4D2/07/KWksUV41w4R duuEuKkcpABj21IMK9iWkPzAv0/L6E8aLQLCHo+KxC+wOcKmdBMU6UUmdw0jpghpVa4R 3Z0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qUNwbGdtPejkxCILAJgrl/pKxTIMT8mHXMhsmTUBd+4=; b=JyppZPGZw6NkNOjFdZygcrEPsg8GW2XtOpI7FFA8PAwdcTcdLxrRDwJFm1oobFoBzn Q8TomclVPuFlWtH3HBcWnwM3t7eUqqPsCkPAYlNoM9A7MxAXJfGxGnuJBv8V2AyIfq1a YCQ0tP0BRGP+hcMoV5zRyiajiqOtNNx0BgTOYXVUT4H2a6Pe/mLfzKHs64iW1sCF7pBp N2c7civsdSuRUHzWNsMizy11wS67emE6KHb9uuDhxCcWa56+dtZma69srcCy++jqbNlp Bu7XXNmT+5KiId4kzs5tFuZbNvc0xO1OVccjoCAj5qdI2Yr2BgeJH1qAfyAY/9yT25bn 5yig== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAWWOufYLnWAWKVjzPuACa1jI6PeENMDj/cvHewK/7SefQkPOYK OVSBzqXLNnHShs1k0p8GkXZSDcvm X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225vR4rsQ7MVxCWY3k2O+BpQqZxFOOOHQpAgh6UvsVDgmBvtCvn3Ovl4OHv9x5NKvCkvQmVcuQ== X-Received: by 10.223.190.17 with SMTP id n17mr3996153wrh.189.1519249534425; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:45:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o12sm23432023wrb.15.2018.02.21.13.45.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:45:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <834lma6xo7.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:143576 Archived-At: On 2/21/18 7:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:47:20 +0200 >> >> So far the last option is winning, but I'd be much more content to use >> it if the Emacs 26 are not going to need it. > > I'm _really_ uneasy about putting this on the release branch. sit-for > is notorious for subtle problems that take a lot of time to be > exposed. Well, ok. I can live with that. Maybe consider it for inclusion if we end up having more pretests? This patch has been in master for a few months, and it's two lines long, so it must be *somewhat* safe. I've pushed the workaround (last option) to company-mode in the meantime.