From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Gildea Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51110: Native-comp leaks fds open on /dev/ptmx Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:28:36 -0800 Message-ID: <98358.1638325716@tigger3.sg.gildea.net> References: <1219754.1633794325@pental> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21289"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51110-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 01 03:29:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msFMw-0005HL-I7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 03:29:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msFMu-0001VX-68 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:29:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44926) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msFMl-0001TR-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msFMk-0007wD-SG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1msFMk-0000Gn-Az for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:29:02 -0500 Resent-From: Stephen Gildea Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 02:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 51110 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 51110@debbugs.gnu.org, stepheng+emacs@gildea.com, stepheng+emacs@gildea.com Original-Received: via spool by 51110-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D51110.16383257251010 (code D ref 51110); Wed, 01 Dec 2021 02:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51110-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2021 02:28:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42872 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1msFMT-0000GE-46 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:28:45 -0500 Original-Received: from tigger.sg.gildea.net ([99.65.78.170]:51142 helo=tigger3.gildea.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1msFMQ-0000Fz-Jd for 51110-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 21:28:43 -0500 Original-Received: from tigger3.sg.gildea.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by tigger3.gildea.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E86B3E0060; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:28:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Message from eliz@gnu.org of 30 Nov 2021 22:29:36 +0200 <838rx5tmj3.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 28.0.60 Content-ID: <98357.1638325716.1@tigger3.sg.gildea.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:221185 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Andrea Corallo > > Cc: stepheng+emacs@gildea.com, 51110@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 20:24:59 +0000 > > > > > I don't think there's anything we _can_ do here, and I tried to > > > explain why. > > > > I agree, I don't think we really want support `invocation-name' > > modifications at runtime. > > > > Shall we close this bug? > > I think so. But before we do, I'd like to let Stephen a chance to > convince us otherwise. I'm happy to see this bug closed, and I hereby do so. Thank you for the discussion.