From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28403: 25.2; find-tag works, but xref-find-definitions Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 01:08:03 +0300 Message-ID: <97f250ef-a63e-4552-0b6d-bbeadabaa475@yandex.ru> References: <201709141737.v8EHb6Ao038578@psr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505426951 7767 195.159.176.226 (14 Sep 2017 22:09:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 22:09:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/56.0 Cc: 28403@debbugs.gnu.org To: Winston , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 15 00:09:05 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dscJj-0001pc-I6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:09:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dscJq-0003Rv-Vb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45804) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dscJl-0003Rj-TX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dscJi-00031H-Oo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:32927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dscJi-00030r-Km for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dscJi-0001HP-Bo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 22:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28403 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28403-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28403.15054268944863 (code B ref 28403); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 22:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28403) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2017 22:08:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41608 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dscIv-0001GN-RT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:08:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com ([209.85.215.48]:56628) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dscIu-0001GB-0h for 28403@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 18:08:12 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id a18so675952lfl.13 for <28403@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:08:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GzqusFq+544QnyLwJ/3jlk8TO9CoSBorKU4QcvpdRYE=; b=EPBZqIRET+SGaEVGEcJrZZnScY/umCXWVLwQNpSMOxCInowg9oG6ucgUJINqKGyLKY eOKeRkNBeLR4WYQILJybRDNzkIY5IEDtg0eB41TQ2gfcgBseMFq6PmZeux9/r7dcr83p hp7yuMUTeEAOWdIKSBLehNM3GtnVgyIcuvcIyV/TPhlci4iPZWnINGqaFnO4kdQCTt+i punZPbl9wV5NqQRvwPHoUhIpuRBdHILdWjyqFXXUz5gVLIDmabU694NTGIqJ0a5vvE5v XlM8x87k5vesbSucjXMqTh9gQA7NKcr9E8Inna/xizFBTM8FqBXTvCw3j+7LdB3nrYvN EikA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GzqusFq+544QnyLwJ/3jlk8TO9CoSBorKU4QcvpdRYE=; b=jBVkrsK0C+N4QL1G/xNAoj5ojMYwlRWTfHPt1RCPHf1uXfMVkCggInvVYNC3pz4q0D hf9CKb7HI/YaPV+WszmB4/wjAeeHHRinWTuXOfgA9xFZbxrx9Q0djMz3+jzqnPENe1D6 fQBvvJeLyhNHpSu3IQ+b3ODurl0CONjLbqsuaonVq3w8S056ZPlm8syEHyRtGWXPDJqk bo7tH7k6sCasiGd0FZC6BHm/oCNbSCBavRFyIaphNp22xxSJaHSPkx2UW1cQS4e6LgLD PURuBnHZxh9sOV4rZTF3dbJVCyQysPdDw/Z5eteGOZzH48D8H72ccakqlR+NGz0on0yk mPjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiZSDfLVojOX+TunGngWTsOifP4FT4Eio5WrKj/pSWBChqF+NfP S4LYheFEHwUF5Xhpf2k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QD5TUFrOM+1OJBRF3JzEIgDIRO95f6O4gl6AcOLYONlBAL66iobkjDIUYMm2H34FJMa6oKVgw== X-Received: by 10.25.18.71 with SMTP id h68mr8664953lfi.217.1505426886104; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.174] ([178.252.127.239]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f199sm3157984lfg.85.2017.09.14.15.08.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:08:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201709141737.v8EHb6Ao038578@psr.com> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136982 Archived-At: On 9/14/17 8:36 PM, Winston wrote: > Dmitry suggested: >> Maybe the manual should advertise the necessity to call etags with >> --regexp in certain cases more prominently instead. > > On the assumption that no one will read the manual until they have to, > I'd still suggest at least a 1-sentence mention of the issue in the > documentation for xref-find-definitions, even if it mostly says see the > manual if you're having problems finding tags. Yes, well, I probably agree from the standpoint of practicality. Even though xref-find-definitions itself knows zilch about etags.