From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [patch] leim/Makefile.in: make distclean should make clean Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:25:03 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <9791-Mon16Feb2004182502+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <87y8r4i27c.fsf@marant.org> <200402152335.IAA17134@etlken.m17n.org> <2914-Mon16Feb2004113906+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <200402161142.UAA18057@etlken.m17n.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1076948944 31337 80.91.224.253 (16 Feb 2004 16:29:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jmarant@nerim.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 16 17:28:57 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Aslc8-0006qe-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:28:56 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Aslc8-0007zx-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 17:28:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AslZt-0004GV-SU for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:26:37 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AslYv-0003pW-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:25:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AslYN-0003Zq-I5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:25:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.22] (helo=gollum.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AslYI-0003Z8-2f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:24:58 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (pns03-205-225.inter.net.il [80.230.205.225]) by gollum.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.4-GR) with ESMTP id CLM35373; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 18:24:40 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Kenichi Handa X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <200402161142.UAA18057@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi Handa on Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:42:57 +0900 (JST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19983 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19983 > Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:42:57 +0900 (JST) > From: Kenichi Handa > > ?? Do we still make the Leim tarball? We don't. But since no release was done yet that included Leim as part of the Emacs tarball, I looked into leim-21.*.tar.gz archives to find out what Leim files should be distributed. > It seems that distclean also should not delete *.elc. It should only delete those *.elc files that were built as part of building Emacs/Leim on the user's machine. Some of the *.elc files are like that (e.g., 4Corner.elc), others aren't. > Then, only the case that we should delete leim/*/*.elc is at > bootstrapping time. Is it right? At bootstrap we should delete *.elc and also those *.el files that were produced from *.tit and other files in *-DIC/ directories.