From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ignoring Info extensions
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:43:32 +0200
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <9743-Fri02Apr2004094332+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
References: <200404020150.i321o1B26583@f7.net>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080892414 31499 80.91.224.253 (2 Apr 2004 07:53:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 07:53:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, janneke@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 02 09:53:27 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B9JUU-0007I2-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:53:26 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B9JUU-0003UB-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:53:26 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B9JQi-00054s-EV
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 02:49:32 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B9JPn-0004AI-TQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 02:48:35 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B9JOr-0002Ys-A2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 02:48:10 -0500
Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B9JNy-0000yW-3q; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 02:46:42 -0500
Original-Received: from zaretski (pns03-209-166.inter.net.il [80.230.209.166])
	by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id CQV54929;
	Fri, 2 Apr 2004 09:46:33 +0200 (IST)
Original-To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry)
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <200404020150.i321o1B26583@f7.net> (karl@freefriends.org)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21192
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21192

> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 20:50:01 -0500
> From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry)
> 
> Eli, can you think of a way
>   \*[Nn]ote[ \t\n]+
> could fail?

That one could work; I was mainly concerned by the preceding blank.

> As Juri says, there are tons of places where "*Note*" is output for
> various reasons.  It would be nice if it just worked

What if we make this case to silently fail, instead of making an
incompatible change?