From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Greg Minshall Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14270: shadow.el, simple.el, shadows shadows Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:12:22 -0400 Message-ID: <96193.1366945942@greg-minshalls-mbp.local> References: <87033.1366918226@greg-minshalls-mbp.local> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366945990 509 80.91.229.3 (26 Apr 2013 03:13:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 03:13:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14270@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 26 05:13:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UVZ61-0005wK-FY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:13:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37831 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UVZ60-0007ZM-Nw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UVZ5v-0007WN-4e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UVZ5s-0007oC-4H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UVZ5s-0007o6-16 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UVZ5p-0005pk-RC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:13:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Greg Minshall Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 03:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14270 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14270-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14270.136694594422362 (code B ref 14270); Fri, 26 Apr 2013 03:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14270) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2013 03:12:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43971 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UVZ5E-0005oc-8V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:12:24 -0400 Original-Received: from relay01.pair.com ([209.68.5.15]:1782) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UVZ5B-0005oL-6C for 14270@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:12:21 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 41742 invoked by uid 0); 26 Apr 2013 03:12:22 -0000 Original-Received: from 99.19.69.197 (HELO gregair.cliq.com) (99.19.69.197) by relay01.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2013 03:12:22 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 99.19.69.197 Original-Received: from greg-minshalls-mbp.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gregair.cliq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F232510BACDAD; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 23:12:22 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:45:02 -0400." <9k3nqazn5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.5; nmh 1.5; GNU Emacs 24.3.2 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:73699 Archived-At: Glenn, yes, you are absolutely right. i had (and have had for years) some buggy code in my .emacs to tweak load-path, which code was causing my load-path to have lots of duplicate entries. i just now re-did that code using push (plus normal-top-level-add-subdirs-to-load-path), and now load-path has no more duplicates, and list-load-path-shadows reports the expected 118 shadowings. thanks, and sorry for the noise. cheers, Greg Minshall