From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Brand new clojure support in Emacs ;-) Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 17:26:55 +0300 Message-ID: <954b61ba-20bc-0e27-f2df-112e668a1f39@gutov.dev> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87a5uw9ivs.fsf@posteo.net> <87ttt42gna.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmy080kn.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8djcydl.fsf@gnu.org> <87350ndquw.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83350ncbns.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyzrjbd8.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87zg2hsyrd.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87h6ontwfv.fsf@posteo.net> <835y4ucrz3.fsf@gnu.org> <831qficgin.fsf@gnu.org> <9a94ddd5-328e-022a-2c5a-9d517dd4375d@gutov.dev> <83jztaas9u.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3918"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cc: rms@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 16:27:56 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qc57q-0000ha-IS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 16:27:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc57G-0007YI-I7; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:27:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc57E-0007Y5-S3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc56z-0003tr-1h; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905173200645; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 10:26:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:26:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1693578418; x=1693664818; bh=NSj/QWSJlmN5BFXLKV1GzQwYmr94hYoW8Hf /JpG28rA=; b=EN9SBPCpOI+sR5GXYCuIQIhx1iMFsJkloXBYxwvCo/D1pZCMYVN AhC6dS8GzLpD/267FI15+8+90JvafwKw4arr6mOfSxOfIXPJe5zSo00swkdK9/07 yDidqZOJ2ivBsWMlzElWFbzyYy6qei8sWf2f8fbnY4j17ZTMIGaCr8QYdwcC7B5I jeMgKdYL3b/ouZP+me+hfMLyMKLg9EthR9pOOlUa2cO5B4vb9zN3+7Xd/9nnTH21 kW+xctGKupbyBLakD7D/HIO7q4V4Gwo85QwRoWU4Kt6uMjrY2BCSgg/2XrnXpzk0 ISAB/SnTS8xXdZeQJ6fKaK07Jq/n//gA/eg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1693578418; x=1693664818; bh=NSj/QWSJlmN5BFXLKV1GzQwYmr94hYoW8Hf /JpG28rA=; b=D1qQ0vF+h/tOM50ioddPBobJTo7hKaMWK8OpSPAY4TWa40xQG04 UsH8S8kYqqRMlUzrydrJ5O0vmLHnRTNXmIta2MrJHw7Yzz4vPIkd99Zx5KI2W5pJ eT5GmgGW+apHoobWxSlarDRXCEeFckqUn/Em2S2N5lRgepTGRnZFE7yS8dyImmXu aEGVueKq9gjXD1/CICJcKOX0zOumW4zl2NlGpKguCQMtKqxa4yFA563xbjULZ/Hy 6MISu6xcjs78hemlelPEX4xXKiixsFj9qZp72fJ+Jko8iVi/2lM2pYKkg/ECtcws BX0NgZlNerybJ7eScDgLLxYcPafLabCv6uw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrudegvddgjeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtjeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeffmhhi thhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepiefgteevheevveffheeltdeukeeiieekueefgedugfefgefhudelgfefveel vdevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug hmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 10:26:56 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83jztaas9u.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.24; envelope-from=dmitry@gutov.dev; helo=wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -55 X-Spam_score: -5.6 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.478, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309804 Archived-At: On 01/09/2023 17:21, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I agree with Richard: authors of packages don't necessarily think > about what's best for Emacs as a whole, and that we shouldn't expect > them to do so. They are responsible for the packages they develop, > not for the development of Emacs as a whole. The issue at hand is not the development of Emacs as a whole, though. But a very specific area. > I don't understand why > this is seen as some kind of negative or derogatory remark. It is > just the consequence of the person's interests and responsibilities. I don't understand how you don't see it as negative and divisive, especially given the context and where this discussion is going.