From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Sainty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Criticism of jit-lock--antiblink-post-command Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:54:33 +1300 Message-ID: <95046d793384835470809c187eb865be@webmail.orcon.net.nz> References: <20191126195236.GA5104@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="141404"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Orcon Webmail Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 27 06:54:54 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iZqHu-000agN-AD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 06:54:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33230 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZqHt-0006o6-85 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:54:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZqHn-0006o0-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:54:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZqHm-0008Rh-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:54:46 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-4.orcon.net.nz ([60.234.4.59]:46841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZqHi-0008FF-IV; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:54:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.253.37.70] (port=56992 helo=webmail.orcon.net.nz) by smtp-4.orcon.net.nz with esmtpa (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZqHZ-0002mP-IZ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:54:33 +1300 Original-Received: from wlgwil-nat-office.catalyst.net.nz ([202.78.240.7]) via [10.253.37.253] by webmail.orcon.net.nz with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:54:33 +1300 In-Reply-To: X-Sender: psainty@orcon.net.nz X-GeoIP: -- X-Spam_score: -2.9 X-Spam_score_int: -28 X-Spam_bar: -- X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 60.234.4.59 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242765 Archived-At: On 2019-11-27 10:09, João Távora wrote: > Regarding the markers, I'll have a look. But it seems > premature optimization. AFAIK that one is standard best practice for working with markers, even if you're not expecting it to make a noticeable difference. -Phil