From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:41:03 -0400 Message-ID: <94BE9654-0294-4CBE-B10C-734620A52D30@dancol.org> References: <875xto7lbn.fsf@dancol.org> <86tth8c7h4.fsf@gnu.org> <865xtndijg.fsf@gnu.org> <135F52E2-4ADA-4012-A624-4784E4B96F0C@dancol.org> <86v81nc237.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6599"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 02 16:42:11 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sOeht-0001Om-1g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 16:42:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOeh0-0003PM-5N; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:41:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOegz-0003Oh-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:41:13 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01:e000:3d8::1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOegu-0002c1-0M; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:41:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zQFfkFrbUmkiCcjUPYbpVBieKg/IZYQEfW5qI1WDCrQ=; b=DKI+Lqyex7M9wPWsSdFvI9t/2d OVRAMQxuZ0kzvh8XSz6Sh/Uj4kVkdJ+Xtv9IOY7p8XxmuzmE7E5Qs+Fr7m/Kps0ZdJUxk+DkKQLbd sHAg06EpnCMR36/8RAQv5Bd2XCQPlcwSse6KwPf9lMjSPwKaHKJ4VG+cLC0Nar2uOOsi0OLr/YhkD CXiAdZDdD4cGnhCIhoHrM977zP+iTTS46qMLG49LAB7Jihxaje4RLQX8aV2hu1XB+mUHTGtiSzZJ2 i1ZNwTIw5947G2Y7igWcLD1+eIAX0tMpN1dAnusQBtr40itW0TALUfi/+y9l+Twhkd+UmIRjDq0a/ bcPHgaEg==; Original-Received: from 2603-9001-4203-1ab2-05eb-444b-867a-c5cd.inf6.spectrum.com ([2603:9001:4203:1ab2:5eb:444b:867a:c5cd]:52772 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sOegp-0003Xg-Sw; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 10:41:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86v81nc237.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2600:3c01:e000:3d8::1; envelope-from=dancol@dancol.org; helo=dancol.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:321165 Archived-At: On July 2, 2024 10:15:08 AM EDT, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 09:53:15 -0400 >> From: Daniel Colascione >> CC: luangruo@yahoo=2Ecom, stefankangas@gmail=2Ecom, monnier@iro=2Eumont= real=2Eca, >> emacs-devel@gnu=2Eorg >>=20 >> >> What use would it be to disable these bindings? >> > >> >It's cleaner, IMO: disabling a mode cleans up after the mode=2E Not a= n >> >"over my dead body" kind of issue, obviously, but still=2E >>=20 >> It's not a mode though=2E > >Well, I think it should be a mode=2E Why?