From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: More Latin-9 input methods?
Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 09:06:37 +0300
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <9427-Sat04May2002090636+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <vafit659f0v.fsf@INBOX.auto.emacs.devel.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020492554 27514 127.0.0.1 (4 May 2002 06:09:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 06:09:14 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 173sjK-00079f-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 04 May 2002 08:09:14 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 173spN-0007L4-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 04 May 2002 08:15:29 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 173sjD-0005eI-00; Sat, 04 May 2002 02:09:07 -0400
Original-Received: from mirapoint.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.20])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 173si4-0005bN-00
	for <emacs-devel@gnu.org>; Sat, 04 May 2002 02:07:56 -0400
Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40])
	by mirapoint.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 2.9.3.2)
	with ESMTP id ACX75038;
	Sat, 4 May 2002 09:07:47 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-Reply-To: <vafit659f0v.fsf@INBOX.auto.emacs.devel.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3570
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3570

> From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=)
> Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 22:01:52 +0200
> 
> Would it be a good idea to create more Latin-9 input methods?

Yes, I think so.  Ideally, I think there should be a set of Latin-9
input methods that exactly mirrors Latin-1 input methods, so that
Latin-1 users migrating to Latin-9 won't feel any significant
differences in their default configuration.