From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f56408a: * lisp/progmodes/xref.el (xref-pop-marker-stack): Don't obsolete. Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:12:42 +0200 Message-ID: <9391945D-5E5D-411C-8BF7-CFDFEBD50986@acm.org> References: <20211026081718.30075.27468@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20211026081719.E1D3721011@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <9806D073-4E56-4616-9C94-3F45513E5FE7@acm.org> <936d9d26-4d94-53db-bb77-7463b8147864@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10537"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 20:16:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfQzt-0002QN-2Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 20:16:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43490 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfQzr-0002v9-Vo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfQwO-0006nV-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:12:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail1453c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.53]:40222 helo=mail266c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfQwL-00071T-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:12:51 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1635271965; bh=orsXLPhZjB9Z0ZEK13c9KP19YgAU2zLnu2tGF1b9HtE=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=IXZ3hPesCrjNod4G/vWec/69cQcMW88p0H0SWwteR36WW9Nci+UlHEVatqG8jkwXB 5efKAU80bL+5PDf69twNA8bFcoX6WrsgCdMQFibMX8yUu4YlmhgJ6swj1s4NgqHEqz W1JLxRzC+Il26RIzW6wJ/vTQrCNu1Uqp42/Cs744= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from [192.168.0.4] (c188-150-171-71.bredband.tele2.se [188.150.171.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail266c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 19QICgbP005458; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 18:12:44 +0000 In-Reply-To: <936d9d26-4d94-53db-bb77-7463b8147864@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A742F1C.6178451D.0004, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.4 cv=Ufwy9IeN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6178451d a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:117 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=vaJtXVxTAAAA:8 a=cmMTdi7pyFq0RkW5yQ8A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=kmPUiMPqtx0cDKZSR7E2:22 X-Origin-Country: SE Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.14.53; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail266c50.megamailservers.eu X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277912 Archived-At: 26 okt. 2021 kl. 11.35 skrev Dmitry Gutov : > I don't have a strong opinion about it, but that's how we usually do = renames: without changing semantics, mark the previous name as obsolete. You are probably right. I'll revert to marking the old name obsolete, = unless someone comes with a strong argument for not doing so.