From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Backward completions Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:30:15 -0800 Message-ID: <91D2839F621B44DB8AF1247C45244F61@us.oracle.com> References: <61C01A08-8FB6-4908-B9F1-B9F1CE3E3D92@gmail.com><20091111212658.GD12012@headley><87fx8kjosa.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org><7b501d5c0911120209x7c8f493fm68fadef6f1311206@mail.gmail.com><87bpj16pkh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87tywsz9lb.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org><200911181950.nAIJonix010387@godzilla.ics.uci.edu><876396bj0k.fsf@mail.jurta.org><200911191829.nAJIT9wf022215@godzilla.ics.uci.edu><23B2BC4062EE4BFBA650120FD73C0254@us.oracle.com> <200911191926.nAJJQIYV007177@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258659139 10153 80.91.229.12 (19 Nov 2009 19:32:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Juri Linkov' , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "'Dan Nicolaescu'" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 19 20:32:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NBCjg-0007xc-ET for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:32:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44126 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBCjf-0004IK-QA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:32:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBCja-0004ET-3g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBCjV-00041c-Am for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:32:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52647 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBCjV-00041N-7o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:31:57 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet11.oracle.com ([141.146.126.233]:19671) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NBCjU-0000fP-Oc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:31:57 -0500 Original-Received: from rgminet13.oracle.com (rcsinet13.oracle.com [148.87.113.125]) by acsinet11.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id nAJJWnXl015811 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:32:50 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt353.oracle.com (acsmt353.oracle.com [141.146.40.153]) by rgminet13.oracle.com (Switch-3.3.1/Switch-3.3.1) with ESMTP id nAJEnnLG019797; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:31:57 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt014.oracle.com by acsmt358.oracle.com with ESMTP id 470619361258659014; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:30:14 -0600 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:30:14 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <200911191926.nAJJQIYV007177@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> Thread-Index: AcppTmljDZKaXU9gSl+Qzrm978kwDwAADtng X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Source-IP: acsmt353.oracle.com [141.146.40.153] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090204.4B059D28.0127:SCFMA4539814,ss=1,fgs=0 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117284 Archived-At: > > > How about C-s searches minibuffer history when *Completions* > > > not shown, and searches *Completions* when shown? > > > > Sounds like a terrible idea, to me. > > Just invites confusion. > > I disagree, it's very much similar to the many DWIM things > that we have. Exactly (cough cough). ;-)