From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adam Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: salv Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:21:35 -0500 Message-ID: <919cbe23-eb36-8fa6-69e0-2d3c6668eb31@alphapapa.net> References: <87bktm2vj6.fsf@posteo.net> <8ff5d294-36b3-2dab-ea56-9170fad14b91@alphapapa.net> <87h73e1cbm.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1865"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Cc: emacs-devel To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 18 21:52:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oDWmu-0000Ho-NN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 21:52:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48352 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oDWmt-0002Zf-R8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:52:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41704) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oDWJL-0002bk-Fq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:21:44 -0400 Original-Received: from cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.47]:65381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oDWJI-0004aR-MM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:21:43 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|inbox@alphapapa.net Original-Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F9A6C2C6C; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 19:21:37 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a246.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 345496C2A0C; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 19:21:37 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1658172097; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=YA9WyNJei7mpUOm7DO5nRKLF7oMrPRQF/LpPu9w1HdgUXU4uhKKbdtL7aB1PTYFfRYel+Q 3ICa5iOiHTPCt7IxmNVCurBfJK9QrZZziefW8WCX7v6mreu6iFQXmvEGa5pXv0PRSSy48h WxrNdFIA8CXMoZuEgSmPZ3XbB8F7t95n4Hu8X1Okkjya0Nu75twQTuSVLSK/W3WTdmsF5Q tLZYuaDQNdRrEBc8zu7F4gyGbTXtU5MGdt098bpAymlj1fXXSNPTVuLUFq8DMa6+nJtLNB KFeTecE2qULXrXmnhn6V2+eAhAsRNk87m2qICM9QrHSkP1QHta03wC6/fwYx1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1658172097; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=Y2eWTxoL1LM4+EUJxsAyQpbi46i8s4SzvFmybgGJH4E=; b=aXkOiSr4y8Wz8O2C5uLyk2CeZ5fVaRctCEFM79GO8PMRrxowsLAu1g1AOlhtJZpUx1ugwE FzTH5ojpCQq5Lt4Okhx5XKluIDaScBjJFExghtv9AZ/HtJTH8/1ViVhYQBNUoi9haxfGW4 Pd/E3rIRTNNUAvNu2OqAK/qKfP9byBgwald3cuJMC5FQdvVGRjdI8U6M1QSp7Tvv9mEDHH 10sNWVY8P1InTiNKPbquAdyf+WJBqf/HzP9mmQffKSGrigcPQKS1SMQz5zC0ZjvNYmLWP3 gkHpkg6hrAA1tw1ljCYTNGZzDrm04T1xc/eXpNka7rRigMz5saylaI/WYK+SAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-674ffb986c-qc5ml; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=adam@alphapapa.net X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|inbox@alphapapa.net X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|inbox@alphapapa.net X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Bored-Inform: 5653b4b717c35647_1658172097731_4099617208 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1658172097730:621762923 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1658172097730 Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a246.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.124.238.78 (trex/6.7.1); Mon, 18 Jul 2022 19:21:37 +0000 Original-Received: from [10.182.0.94] (unknown [154.6.28.31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: inbox@alphapapa.net) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a246.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LmsJw3wS6z3P; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 12:21:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alphapapa.net; s=dreamhost; t=1658172096; bh=Y2eWTxoL1LM4+EUJxsAyQpbi46i8s4SzvFmybgGJH4E=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ahi+hdmBHGvCQXSJ7zB8KrZlGz+GfvhfkK93izeibPvym5cRrn4x6cKZF+8xlNvX8 2caDieGzR+1IX0MbgPy3ry+QQaQK3xYPBL/Svv78nzxg/Gl4e99keMWhTY2jfyAo8r +0dRM7SQIgW6ZS16DDL1VLSe7wIEsyaal4rxEeE7nlI3w9TTpzM+n+iyIBMqGZsc0v 9fLUMrRoY29ode06hGzIm1uQB0/QCdilcii5nFIFZ6IqoAHHBm8vU5drJFlsKDSuMN JiODf+YHCOM3wg0VulKyftndFFi1zLo0zcVU9QMmVB5IJRxQOv+YyqFvx937G5Hrtp sWZ0S+gamIV3g== Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87h73e1cbm.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: neutral client-ip=23.83.212.47; envelope-from=adam@alphapapa.net; helo=cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:292242 Archived-At: On 7/18/22 13:54, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > I was not making a concrete suggestion, I just believe that the > feature could be implemented by changing the current way auto-saving > is done. > > E.g. what confuses me about the current implementation is that > `auto-save-default' is t by default any way, so just enabling > `salv-mode' the way the commentary section describes it wouldn't add > anything new? As a quick idea, would it make sense to allow > `auto-save-default' to be a function that is called whenever the > decision is to be made whether or not a buffer should be auto-saved? salv-mode saves buffers to their visited files by calling save-buffer. It doesn't have anything to do with "auto-save" to backup files.