From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: A Soare Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation of constants in LISP Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:41:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <9194003.73111172054498963.JavaMail.www@wwinf4003> Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172054530 2585 80.91.229.12 (21 Feb 2007 10:42:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 21 11:42:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HJovA-000844-Fq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:42:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJov4-0005y0-Vm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:41:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HJout-0005vE-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:41:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HJous-0005uM-Lt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:41:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJous-0005uH-J1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:41:42 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp1.voila.fr ([193.252.22.174]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HJouq-00082G-8f; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:41:40 -0500 Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf4006.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0AEA71C013E4; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:41:39 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from wwinf4003 (wwinf4003 [172.22.157.30]) by mwinf4006.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F0F8B1C013E2; Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:41:38 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20070221104138987.F0F8B1C013E2@mwinf4006.voila.fr X-Originating-IP: [89.34.170.37] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-CC: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66576 Archived-At: > > In fact, it might be ideal if this feature for indenting keywords > applies only when indenting a list whose car is not recognized > as a known function at all. In case that the function is not recognized, please somebody tell me what should happen if the previous line is completely commented: 1. to align in the same line with the comment 2. to align to the last previous 2 symbol, if one of them is constant and it lies on the last uncommented line