From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: A proposal for a friendlier Emacs Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 07:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <916af7e9-961b-44e5-ab11-0f128f52a8fe@default> References: <4be18b5f-dc07-2703-a2de-1ed08916ebdf@gmail.com> <1e340d941b6fd0b21a477f39fc935468@condition-alpha.com> <48e632cab427c838b1cc20a190f4959d@condition-alpha.com> <91bb3e347d5caed9487a2cd8e6d0db04@condition-alpha.com> <4deb019b-8034-4f18-9bd6-98424a0f09ee@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32800"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: alexander.adolf@condition-alpha.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 26 16:32:37 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kMBFc-0008QC-Ae for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 16:32:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMBFb-0000vc-D1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:32:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMBCj-0007s7-Sx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:29:37 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:54142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMBCX-0008WE-Ey; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:29:37 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08QET80i058008; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 14:29:18 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=wdyWS9yAYKD482dCVrFVQqV4qS6zfGIere1RsKktK+M=; b=ddw9XPaFbDZJz1+Y+mpfyhmE7017iP9hzMK+qBO289nuOwliK6gF4gyqMuFjkkxx7TnI oGXUcpXSXvtuF3TOhvyYG4ihnO+hckYaz6s0D1i7QexMDXQB5OxN8Z/x6Rzbq3YEqGO5 k+QW8TQAdA8w1QwqIUJ1XK+UaqhHc3hw4y2QEb0x2xYg5+haBcdRP1j9ypuArMzz4sjZ TVbbHDhpJoNGDhofJfHlnw/NMDo+2bwrEH/vsYYOfLHzoBr2fYcJTFcsgd9j68At/LDy qEn3N5XzLHVus2pGt57I5haXLE1/0Xhcdbg/Wx1HO/39lvKor0rUAdglqAP539OTtyWh /Q== Original-Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33sx9mrn3f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 26 Sep 2020 14:29:18 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08QEKd65172918; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 14:29:18 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 33sup8hqs6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 26 Sep 2020 14:29:17 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0006.oracle.com (abhmp0006.oracle.com [141.146.116.12]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 08QETFhU031601; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 14:29:15 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5056.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9756 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=1 mlxlogscore=910 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009260130 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9756 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=925 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009260131 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.85; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2120.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/26 10:29:22 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -55 X-Spam_score: -5.6 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256466 Archived-At: > > Should we really conflate the set of Emacs > > users with "registered repository users"? >=20 > I don't follow you. You seem to be criticizing > something but I don't know what. (A question is criticism now?) I responded to this: The number of registered repository users who have clicked on "add to favourites" for the package in question. I questioned whether "registered repository users" is a good proxy for Emacs users. Presumably not all Emacs users will be registered repository users (?). Maybe the difference needs to be taken into account in some way? A question. (No, I don't know what a "registered repository user" is. But AFAIK I'm not one, and I am an Emacs user.)