From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-29 44ebd9cbd56 2/2: Eglot: explain how to update Eglot in manual (bug#62720) Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 12:05:59 +0300 Message-ID: <91595171-be7a-c52c-8909-7efe0354c572@gutov.dev> References: <168263878553.23108.4718240877999827191@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20230427233949.44D31C22A13@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20f53b0a-d6ff-8ec0-2f8c-e0e22b2d49dc@gutov.dev> <6a09451b-88dd-ff00-2bdc-cb34d457adef@gutov.dev> <4e327f05-705c-4a29-a216-0cb296bee91a@app.fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19218"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 04 11:07:01 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1puUvT-0004jk-NJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 May 2023 11:07:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puUuj-0000g9-0c; Thu, 04 May 2023 05:06:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puUuf-0000fr-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2023 05:06:10 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1puUuY-0000wi-Rk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2023 05:06:09 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3EB5C016C; Thu, 4 May 2023 05:06:01 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 May 2023 05:06:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t= 1683191161; x=1683277561; bh=AomcHWz8/DNJreFtaAt90MfhAnRdhlODqQz 0Op1XdMY=; b=rO0UqtM16qah7peXFZM4Eq49RCezNAMNn07i8cZyAA7R4G1C8Ei XxTxFjKnGoRu4TireTlWZopHL/qbbamNSITVcVl3XlqisdyWOHdhQk2wSu48NL/H 0wVHdKMEzr8cm6XuB61grukkdF5VJH56/3UOFmLZ3yUGVsKshf1UEajfsU5dS2M5 vEqWRH786RcsXqETsciAAyQ9KGY/JMBvo1QKJOsn4WC6kqf023lni7yYNbW9fCWj UzYiySiIZVJ5PTOh27MccoRQaUrIz5aa79z0una7TG9rQ2sBk3SXcPRGyfYd4xQF qUg0R+zYM3bbQqfzULPOn83ZYDUmOlI2G8g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1683191161; x=1683277561; bh=AomcHWz8/DNJreFtaAt90MfhAnRdhlODqQz 0Op1XdMY=; b=J3lNxRXPycuH+TJjGABrfmvYK3dbduT6id1+X6XiWJVtH450VnO L4YzrB8aw1lVtXFZf6kI0cCf4b7kz/TtCyvwHqTmSmYd0lPpHKWPlGmBKnsPMJUo eRDRL07pyMcrELaNx+C5Ct3FlEC7Aftq/+dE/YZ7YEC0nhYK53wPdc7Ex5n7jIzC 2rOA/PZa1Bkt1xKFYKtGZ5rHGLz112/47iwvL9yCCfoHMrc7yY6NVEHpc8VJ5S5x XdfcHmZBMUTOvAolWiz8uKr9FroR/lg1sGQevSOtdjP1nSTsDQaq8Jme3ZDxk2KP 6jq4ax30RpDayO44wICM1EFdT+C/8sCTXDQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrfeeftddgudduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeffmhhi thhrhicuifhuthhovhcuoegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhephfffheeljeffgeffueeghfekkedtfffgheejvdegjeettdduheeufffggfef jeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepug hmihhtrhihsehguhhtohhvrdguvghv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 4 May 2023 05:06:00 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.28; envelope-from=dmitry@gutov.dev; helo=out4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -70 X-Spam_score: -7.1 X-Spam_bar: ------- X-Spam_report: (-7.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-4.28, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305828 Archived-At: On 04/05/2023 04:09, João Távora wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 1:57 AM Dmitry wrote: >> On Thu, May 4, 2023, at 3:50 AM, João Távora wrote: >> >> Anyway, I would rather not have people that have already gotten 1.15 and >> using it (not many) seeing eglot-update change to eglot-upgrade. >> By 1.20 noone will remember, but I think we should at least add a >> compatibility alias (eglot-upgrade being the advertised one, and keep >> eglot-update for 3/4 versions). >> >> That would make the situation even more of a mess, wouldn't it? Unless you intend to drop the alias after a couple of Eglot's releases. But that wouldn't be possible because both names would have appeared in Emacs 29. > Why messy? "update" and "upgrade" and used interchangeably > anyway in speech/writing. But if it's "less messy" to revert eglot-update > then no problem. > Here's an idea: only add the alias on master, to be in the next ELPA release of Eglot. Then you could phase it out a couple of releases later, before Emacs 30 is done.