From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51883: 29.0.50; Command to get accidentally deleted frames back Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:58:15 +0100 Message-ID: <91592ff6-3f5b-0fbc-27d0-7681240b5641@gmx.at> References: <87czn1gfb1.fsf@web.de> <838rxo0zk7.fsf@gnu.org> <86lez73auf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86y236vlfm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86zgnms469.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8635ld0zq7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838rv5j87a.fsf@gnu.org> <83o840huco.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21927"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, gregory@heytings.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 51883@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 25 17:00:08 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nCOEq-0005WB-BM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 17:00:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33244 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCOEp-0001M5-9s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:00:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCOED-0000z7-58 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:59:29 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCODl-0006ds-Qu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:59:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nCODl-00085n-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:59:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51883 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 51883-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51883.164312631031062 (code B ref 51883); Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2022 15:58:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49789 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nCODG-00084w-Aj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:58:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:47567) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nCODD-00084f-JR for 51883@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:58:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1643126297; bh=gtUvOtAA20Nk/GOh+7BqJ7yWKp1cMIwQZzMg3hOoWIw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=VW6CjpO94C6a6X+FsnxqBRoAEOYQuZoVQgFwi7x1tSlKwrWmWIbLTMkjABklujTZF rRV+gN9r6u3KnzjyP31HjhKmtg6xSqdba7Wa89rdTwVXVYYaasBnfLjEiW6ikv74qR RcaigaiB+UsvF9WTqE3kNARvX3DgMefvU8y9uKTM= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([212.95.5.20]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M89Gj-1n8nRC2k1j-005EkY; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:58:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83o840huco.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:OsJAqNpB6tzMGjGqdNj3uD/wTLlila1QYksTYne4b891uyID8nC jajyjMRuC1KU3y3n5ECp3Lyq2brsZrFqWGmZtv0KoTaF0rTt1pPYlrGEAOD9bqTn1aQv9yq 01qUL3PRFnbchicrllbSgJd/El9J2WEf/Te/B4C09mG+oV3UoMJJOYYSn4XF+zR1X0VicKk 6rUhko1DXzv9kt5Hoks1w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:9WmAW6/VjGY=:dICR03e003K0pHuOkndGXh u1RM+p20/YEWWxMoKVNj6R43zXWOS0hJVVktfpjJi6EUOvbDvtQKh6/o9G6TGwqmsSUvk4xR6 NPvsEsgcYSmMa0tyB8G5PzVglD9QTtwrRQIRZCgA6Y239lmotUqAPQrvUH5fk1FD26KCUG18U qpCPvbdolRfy8F4wvEmQ+/F00+e8yaK072ifeVUlAY3HhZyEvT9JXSoLAtv+e8qYpk3xq/CHQ 9kr1lNJz0CYs5syGCJj/GpT8CloiJgk1QdeF+9WwiuAKXeZt/x6OXw6jrq/x2fwHt1sERDEYX DSRemJHYanR4KmbOA8Aaaoo7U9kyQlCLPZ0JJ3St0M3e+2d6+LMTbXGhROtz+r6ZbNEfOR/Vz O+wXTv67MsZFC5YkSq5Ds2IzzOTLHdDz1ApQZkd8rm/1dJjoTcIxGIt7SMgvCTf1id5YICoig fh5vrTiofmKO6KSXilcxCpIIMn5lDA1mUauQP1BP4WQpRgMedbYsPb8O3otNzkaKOWinO2ihf XaNC97oOIfB11/LNvxL0Lo85cmM5vO/nMcOxdwrMpsW40NJP4LJGN640s9mYppJZ3Oi32v7ft Hlxg9zNc20NsgRNZ5Njujm1wMgxiaBy+V+t55ZfISQEANr86vU8vViP8fjIBaXozt1f1xS1LT 7zF+SWQn5ieasUz3afRbx7LYmWJmMkBO2e7feCC86rmmgTcdND+tnpfrUmY+cKFrQw1w2mNGS icrRfdlf1YFuVBsAC18Sr6tGBPTovxPhb1pqKqn+GnAg0qeBeo3LxBer6nFKds+gQvSsjwfm X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225195 Archived-At: > Which other parameters would you suggest to remove (on master)? It would be pretentious to answer that question. The comment starting at line 261 of frameset.el tells that ;; - `window-id', `outer-window-id', `parent-id': They are assigned ;; automatically and cannot be set, so keeping them is harmless, but they ;; add clutter. `window-system' is similar: it's assigned at frame ;; creation, and does not serve any useful purpose later. so according to that comment, leaving 'parent-id' in the list should not have caused any problems. Thanks to Juri, we know better now. For anyone who wants to peruse the parameters of an existing frame, however, reading the ";; Filtering" comment in frameset.el should be an indispensable prerequisite. Juanma (and maybe others) have invested a lot of work there - consider entries on 'frameset--text-pixel-height' or 'minibuffer'. Disregarding that text when implementing a function that pretends to clone a frame is just recklessness. martin