From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69993: Wrap window buffers while cycling Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 10:37:27 +0100 Message-ID: <91327e7b-d0a5-4f3a-a1f8-218d118608d6@gmx.at> References: <86h6gug41x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <3419df35-1b96-4a64-8ed7-722a05c58742@gmx.at> <86le66ckhj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86h6gs2lk7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <5c71ea64-0f97-4b90-af61-1156fe33f1ea@gmx.at> <86cyreu78w.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <463c9242-56ef-4c99-9fe6-4b70be2071b2@gmx.at> <86sf0abeg3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86v855ggkv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Reply-To: martin rudalics Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27062"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: 69993@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 30 10:38:07 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rqVA6-0006pT-SK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 10:38:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rqVA2-0007KL-VW; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rqVA0-0007Jg-QD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:38:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rqVA0-0005MX-HJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:38:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rqVA2-0001xp-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2024 09:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69993 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69993-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69993.17117914587506 (code B ref 69993); Sat, 30 Mar 2024 09:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69993) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2024 09:37:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43985 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rqV9e-0001wy-86 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:37:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:54543) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rqV9c-0001wm-C7 for 69993@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:37:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.at; s=s31663417; t=1711791448; x=1712396248; i=rudalics@gmx.at; bh=YvHmON1Q61J+LtsvRGR1Q3odTcAQTXBrLLk9VOrAXYQ=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To; b=PhNHyY6c4GSItLJKaic7zGpbf9O8PC1oJS0BDQc3OpK14tR+Tot8JogWxxUjb37a VDAI9LHYOMoPchAB+engI6Q6wyI66dVo2vSE0HTGmJM4L/xjYoflZ1EzHDVMYR+6z RYkXA3mbfQ4WavdSdXTQSXW19hxBYFtwlHHo2EWQSOqCthbwUkrLyc34SlWRZS5nM Ru/gqxb7wIzc8jc07DabM73xvvJ90LF1bIqFHpXNPVM7dvmUe1OkTI/WOdN9JGsAl 8drlPUcgciQUu7WNW4Rc6tjvDh/c4yoL4QHict2Lgleng3QrHVDicHxEHiy+xDG4+ X2r2JIyVqUnYviBm4w== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from [192.168.31.113] ([46.125.249.110]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MI5UD-1s1n1r0yoh-00FFOc; Sat, 30 Mar 2024 10:37:28 +0100 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <86v855ggkv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Pystew+nsSlvTXZJH54gnJhX3oFfaKYHB1NXmz4M6Rbm07pBvuq 4SMlegidlzBihqFuvHvYLfq8WQ6rPCPUeW9sYqYX+DD4GddSgTK7gpQm1+poeEWv+nbze5k ZKBZzR5TNB3UnyyVF722txiGzE6dVnFnPs/7E9QHop53fYSEqt6Ny43pI61wh/9lWnhtlJC 4tXvqiDQVhJ97efgDagfg== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:rc4Z43aEq0M=;/Bof01i2gv8PqHe5+4MGok2D7bm tNAMvEYwkseHqKfA9hqJjP6GRxol+ufuqks2B9ER+zOIwqxfBoyMp0nWaqZuJtSCwOztC/95O o6Nf1h32if9XWmXSaE1EJl6BJU+ZzxpwzE8d0znDxb3wvzfbS+6idez5GjJdMYSUEl0uGBNeN xBDIXKvXLPQT9SudVALosS5mcaPIbxU0/x7bQLxrFxrOILOtIKbsmpcd0Z2RC3Rdu4xB+4Sgv 5kIwNR5OP687mOC4C8RZRTRglCRhM9u+G04+vyt4tdx8x0gU1Y+njrDgSyHAWHS6SfEEvjpBm tR4mP1sSvVfTQUxPJnbJwVKd1fOfz1eL9iv1Bw9JGmcMxw9+8XdTqFZdiY5XdSRDjBhgzbIcy MlkahDzYWRsfr489DvfcliIoeOJ4nriYLgxvEHo6sVayMHfRW/bt3J6jhdyxfQuzu7v86SBbx s4czpRDa5WPCq7pohMQhC5SKemIMjsl7zsTrlEZetEOm/CP3vnfMPBsndwBUtGIdR8LLyNmzP HMHUopExIjrXbKP1IWiFyKzwjKNPO3174t4Mh9aCnhyxFEIAi2fZdyj+jnIQAZyC1nt/UQX1s E5d1Z6ch2hXJnymDxXjM72wNY/mKyjxzLE3TZpHc3oIMhE95bT7dA2VXAxoHORzahfJ9dSs7i 7q8xXfnSE/dgFIfBzsWbVc+1YwmhdQHsLCse0oNnlxdbpPMae0nPlmdjyxjqvGW3xCmdHCJxl Mp8tix0eUAkto94vJ/HKI+/0XQlsDdRQF7xc2pb3M24yUHlQL5FefXaLOkTZAi5692L7VJvN X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:282340 Archived-At: > Sorry for the confusion. This feature request was only about C-x C-left. ... and about C-x C-right presumably. > C-x b was just speculation about a possible separate option. Please can we start again from scratch please: - I do like the idea of having an option to constrain buffers switched to via C-x and C-x to those shown in that window before. - I do like the idea of having an option controlling whether C-x and C-x should wrap to the last/first buffer (regardless of whether buffers switched to appeared in the window before or not). - I agree that the orders of tabs shown by 'tab-line-mode' should not change when a buffer that already appeared in a window is shown again in that window - the window's buffer is already highlighted appropriately in the tab line in that case. But this last requirement of 'tab-line-mode' should not affect the order of buffers in a window's list of previous and next buffers. martin