From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MH-E 7.4.4 checked in Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:35:35 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <9003-Wed14Jul2004233535+0300-eliz@gnu.org> References: <1890.1089689203@newt.com> <2914-Tue13Jul2004070451+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <3589.1089692661@newt.com> <2914-Tue13Jul2004215551+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <861xjfkpgu.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089837486 17127 80.91.224.253 (14 Jul 2004 20:38:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 14 22:37:47 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BkqVe-0007TV-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:37:46 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BkqVe-0005Km-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:37:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BkqY5-0006kp-NR for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:40:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BkqXp-0006iI-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BkqXl-0006hS-3u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:40:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BkqXl-0006hP-1X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:39:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BkqUW-0000X2-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:36:37 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.141.239]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DTJ35894; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:36:24 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: Kai Grossjohann X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <861xjfkpgu.fsf@rumba.de.uu.net> (message from Kai Grossjohann on Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:38:57 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25699 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25699 > From: Kai Grossjohann > Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:38:57 +0200 > > What I do with Tramp is that I merge the *.el files into the Emacs > repository and then, manually, compose ChangeLog entries describing > the changes. > > So usually the ChangeLog in the Tramp repository might have many > entries between two releases, whereas the Emacs repository typically > just has two entries for each release (one for Michael's changes and > one for my own changes). The ChangeLog entries in the Emacs > repository summarize the Tramp entries in such a way that, for > example, changes made and then reverted are not described (since the > intermediate version never showed up in the Emacs repository). > > What do people think about this? I think Miles objected to having such edits in ChangeLog.