From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13925: ERRMAX in lib-src/pop.c Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:57:04 -0400 Message-ID: <8zfw00i8nj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <513F896F.4030804@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1363130284 19203 80.91.229.3 (12 Mar 2013 23:18:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13925@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 13 00:18:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UFYSe-0001gx-Hj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:18:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54169 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFYSH-0006cs-GQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:18:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFYS8-0006c3-HW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:17:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFYS1-0008S5-WC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:17:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFXCq-0001Rv-54 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:58:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UFXDp-0007ze-RX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:59:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13925 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13925-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13925.136312549030659 (code B ref 13925); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13925) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2013 21:58:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UFXCz-0007yS-N4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:56258 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UFXCx-0007yL-LN for 13925@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFXBw-0002It-Cm; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:57:04 -0400 X-Spook: 9/11 CDC Peking Sundevil ANDVT digicash SAFE Pine Gap X-Ran: 81]w*8j}l>v.ci[3T]~c[yPB4+FIa("1^gDfIGZ7IxYxUX;-XW@|!b.J;Ff1@qSTr*J|M' X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <513F896F.4030804@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:00:47 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:72401 Archived-At: Paul Eggert wrote: > Here's the obvious patch. Glenn, should I install this into > the emacs-24 branch or into the trunk? I'm a bit fuzzy on > the branch status now that 24.3 has been released. It is a totally safe fix, so emacs-24. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-03/msg00058.html My rule of thumb: if we had to release from emacs-24 tomorrow due to some gaping security problem, am I happy to put this patch there today?