From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recognizing obsolete external package versions Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:18:25 -0400 Message-ID: <8y1web58zy.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <46BCD7C1.8060003@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186784127 998 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2007 22:15:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 11 00:15:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IJclN-0004GD-VD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:15:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJclN-0002x8-D4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:15:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IJclJ-0002wx-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:15:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IJclI-0002wf-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:15:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJclI-0002wc-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:15:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IJclH-0006J6-RK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:15:15 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IJcoL-0007NH-HC; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:18:25 -0400 X-Spook: e-cash cryptographic Pine Gap nuclear e-bomb JPL Baranyi X-Ran: ,rI[96_[t/DxR*/Q-4GXjsYv#XN_H5$q*ft20,V8*~CXICS]<0epH^!Vfa5v),P;0|kjk3 X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <46BCD7C1.8060003@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:25:21 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76333 Archived-At: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" wrote: > What if even older versions of semantics are used? Yes, what if they are? If you have evidence that they cause a problem, then obviously the semantic-version test can be generalized.