From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 10783@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org
Subject: bug#10783: Some built-in functionslost their argument names
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:40:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8qzkcpj8oi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8339ah1yek.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:01:55 +0200")
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Deleting the doc-strings altogether from the duplicate definitions in
>> pc-win.el would make this problem go away.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but deleting the doc string from
> pc-win.el shows x-get-selection-internal as "not documented" in the
> MS-DOS build.
I hadn't got round to checking whether that happened, or whether it
picked up a doc string from one of the other definitions.
I was also thinking that there would not be many users of the MS-DOS
build wanting to look at the doc of the x-* functions, so rather than
you having to keep them in sync all the time, you could just remove
them. Eg there are already many compat x-* functions without docs in
pc-win.el.
> So for now, I sync'ed the doc strings with the X sources.
Thanks.
It still leaves the initial problem I noticed of the argument names
being lost. I wonder if it helps if to also add the "(fn ..." part to
the end of the pc-win.el doc strings?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-11 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-10 21:25 bug#10783: Some built-in functionslost their argument names Glenn Morris
2012-02-10 23:04 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-02-10 23:30 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-11 7:43 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-02-11 9:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-02-11 10:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-02-11 22:40 ` Glenn Morris [this message]
2012-02-12 3:23 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-12 4:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-02-12 5:14 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-12 16:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-03-06 19:50 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-12 4:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-02-12 15:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-02-12 16:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-02-12 17:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-02-12 19:53 ` Glenn Morris
2012-02-13 13:19 ` Jason Rumney
2012-02-13 15:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-02-12 19:58 ` Glenn Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8qzkcpj8oi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rgm@gnu.org \
--cc=10783@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.